Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Determination of Inorganic Arsenic in a Wide Range of Food Matrices using Hydride Generation - Atomic Absorption Spectrometry.
Published on: September 1, 2017
Inorganic arsenic in seafood: does the extraction method matter?
Ásta H Pétursdóttir1, Helga Gunnlaugsdóttir2, Eva M Krupp3
1TESLA-Trace Element Speciation Laboratory, Chemistry, College of Physical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, Scotland, UK; MATIS, Environment and Genetics Department, Vinlandsleid 12, Reykjavik 113, Iceland.
The extraction method significantly impacts inorganic arsenic (iAs) measurements in seafood, particularly in lobster hepatopancreas (TORT-2). Dilute acids like HNO3 and HCl yielded higher iAs concentrations than dilute NaOH.
Area of Science:
- Analytical Chemistry
- Environmental Science
- Food Safety
Background:
- Accurate measurement of inorganic arsenic (iAs) in seafood is crucial for human health risk assessment.
- Seafood composition can influence the efficiency of various extraction methods for trace elements.
- Standardized methods are needed to ensure reliable and comparable iAs data across studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the influence of nine different extraction methods on inorganic arsenic (iAs) determination in seafood.
- To compare iAs concentrations obtained using various methods in certified reference materials (CRMs) and a commercial fish meal.
- To identify extraction methods that provide the most accurate and reproducible iAs measurements in seafood.
Main Methods:
- Evaluation of nine distinct extraction protocols for seafood samples.
- Analysis of inorganic arsenic (iAs) concentrations using certified reference materials (DOLT-4 and TORT-2) and a herring fish meal.
- Standardized experimental conditions with a single operator and instrumentation to minimize laboratory-induced variability.
Main Results:
- Low concentrations of inorganic arsenic (iAs) were consistently found in DOLT-4 and herring fish meal across all extraction methods.
- CRM TORT-2 showed significant differences in iAs extraction, with dilute nitric acid (HNO3) and hydrochloric acid (HCl) yielding higher concentrations.
- Dilute sodium hydroxide (NaOH) in 50% ethanol resulted in significantly lower extracted iAs from TORT-2 compared to acidic methods; other solvents showed no significant differences.
Conclusions:
- The choice of extraction method critically affects inorganic arsenic (iAs) quantification in certain seafood matrices, notably TORT-2.
- Acidic extraction solvents (HNO3, HCl) appear more effective for extracting iAs from lobster hepatopancreas compared to alkaline solvents.
- Method-dependent variability in iAs determination necessitates careful selection of extraction protocols for accurate seafood analysis and risk assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Extraction: Advanced Methods
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Lab
Solutions containing organic solvents, such as low-molecular-mass alcohols, esters, or ketones, enhance absorbances by increasing...
Sample Preparation for Analysis: Advanced Techniques
Acid digestion with strong acids is commonly used to dissolve inorganic materials that are insoluble (do not dissolve) in water. This method can be useful for...
Precipitation and Co-precipitation

