Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Risk perception, experience, and objective risk: a cross-national study with European emergency survivors
Daniela Knuth1, Doris Kehl, Lynn Hulse
1Department Health and Prevention, Institute of Psychology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Previous emergency experience increases perceived risk for similar events and shows minor cross-over effects to other hazards. Objective risk and country of residence also influence perceptions, particularly for earthquakes.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Risk Perception Studies
- Emergency Management
Background:
- Understanding public responses to hazardous events is crucial for effective emergency management.
- Direct experience with a hazard often heightens future risk perception, but cross-over effects to other hazards are less understood.
- The influence of objective risk levels and national context on perceived risk requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of direct experience on perceived risk for various emergency events.
- To examine potential cross-over effects of hazard experience on the perception of other risks.
- To assess the influence of objective risk and country of residence on public risk perception.
Main Methods:
- Survey data collected from 1,045 emergency survivors across seven European countries (Germany, Czech Republic, Poland, Sweden, Spain, Turkey, Italy) as part of the BeSeCu Project.
- Analysis of perceived risk levels for domestic/public fires, earthquakes, floods, and terrorist attacks.
- Statistical examination of the relationship between prior experience, objective risk, country of residence, and perceived risk.
Main Results:
- Individuals perceived heightened risk for emergency events they had previously experienced.
- Evidence of cross-over effects was found, where experience with one hazard influenced perception of others, though effects were not substantial.
- Significant country differences in perceived earthquake risk were observed, but diminished when objective earthquake risk was considered.
- Minimal country-level differences in perceived risk were noted for fires, floods, terrorist attacks, and traffic accidents.
Conclusions:
- Prior direct experience with emergencies is a significant factor in shaping perceived risk for similar and related events.
- While cross-over effects exist, they appear less pronounced than direct experience effects.
- Objective risk and national context play a role in risk perception, with objective earthquake risk moderating country-specific differences.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Relative Risk
Hazard Rate
Bystander Effect
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Survival Curves
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...

