Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

716
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
716
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

10.2K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
10.2K
Drug Product Performance: In Vitro–In Vivo Correlation01:20

Drug Product Performance: In Vitro–In Vivo Correlation

431
In pharmaceutical development, it's crucial to establish a predictive in vitro–in vivo correlation (IVIVC) for two or more formulations to gain a comprehensive understanding of release properties. IVIVC reduces the need for costly in vivo studies and facilitates the establishment of meaningful dissolution specifications with significant cost savings and decreased regulatory burden. Furthermore, a meaningful IVIVC should predict Cmax and AUC within 20%, aligning with FDA guidance while...
431
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

5.8K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
5.8K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

12.9K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.9K
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test01:09

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test

6.2K
In parametric statistics, two fundamental tests stand out for their utility and wide application: the Student's t-test and goodness-of-fit tests. These tests provide researchers with a robust method for drawing insights from data, testing hypotheses, and making informed decisions based on their findings.
The Student's t-test is a statistical test that examines if there is a statistically significant difference between the means of two groups. This test is instrumental when dealing with...
6.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Hearing Aid Expert: Audiologist, Dealer, or Otolaryngologist?

American journal of audiology·2015
Same author

Understanding protocol performance: impact of criterion and test correlation.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2014
Same author

Partial allograft replacement of the radial head in the management of complex fracture-dislocations of the elbow.

Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery·2011
Same author

Evaluating a model to predict protocol performance.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2010
Same author

Complications of distal radius fractures.

Hand clinics·2009
Same author

Complications of distal radius fractures.

The Orthopedic clinics of North America·2007
Same journal

Psychometric Rigor Before Clinical or Research Implementation.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

American Academy of Audiology Health-Related Quality of Life Benefits of Amplification for Adults with Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review Protocol.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

Evidence Synthesis and Open Science: A Tutorial for Systematic Reviews and Beyond in Audiology Research.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

State and Trait Anxiety Alter Postural Control in Healthy Adults.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

Differentiating Superior and Inferior Vestibular Neuritis: Insights from an Integrated VEMP and vHIT Assessment.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

Test-Retest Reliability of the Triangle Completion Test.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 4, 2026

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

7.0K

Understanding protocol performance: impact of test performance.

Robert G Turner1

  • 1Department of Communication Disorders, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
|January 4, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Protocol performance is best with uncorrelated tests of equal performance. Greater variation in individual test performance, especially with more tests, significantly degrades overall protocol effectiveness.

More Related Videos

Human Circadian Phenotyping and Diurnal Performance Testing in the Real World
10:16

Human Circadian Phenotyping and Diurnal Performance Testing in the Real World

Published on: April 7, 2020

9.6K
A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training
07:05

A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training

Published on: August 24, 2017

13.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 4, 2026

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

7.0K
Human Circadian Phenotyping and Diurnal Performance Testing in the Real World
10:16

Human Circadian Phenotyping and Diurnal Performance Testing in the Real World

Published on: April 7, 2020

9.6K
A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training
07:05

A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training

Published on: August 24, 2017

13.7K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Informatics
  • Diagnostic Test Evaluation

Background:

  • This study investigates factors influencing diagnostic protocol performance, building on prior work on test correlation and criteria.
  • Understanding protocol performance is crucial for estimating, limiting, justifying, and selecting appropriate diagnostic strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze how varying individual test performance impacts overall protocol effectiveness.
  • To evaluate these effects across different protocol criteria and levels of test correlation.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a mathematical model to compute protocol performance.
  • Simulated scenarios with varying degrees of individual test performance variation.
  • Examined the influence of different protocol criteria and test correlations.

Main Results:

  • Individual test performance significantly influences protocol outcomes; better individual tests yield better protocols.
  • Increased variation in test performance degrades certain criteria advantages and introduces new disadvantages.
  • The negative impact of test variation intensifies with more tests in the protocol.

Conclusions:

  • Optimal protocol performance is achieved with uncorrelated individual tests of uniform performance.
  • Higher variation in test performance generally reduces protocol effectiveness.
  • When test performance varies, protocols with fewer tests are advisable to mitigate negative impacts.