Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Association Between Baseline Anti-HLA (Class I and II) and Anti-MICA Antibodies and Inflammatory Cell Infiltrates in Grafted Bone After Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation: An Exploratory Secondary Histological Study.

Life (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Bone Regeneration After Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Allogeneic and Xenogeneic Biomaterials with Adjunctive Photobiomodulation: Histological and Radiological Secondary Outcomes of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Journal of functional biomaterials·2026
Same author

Optical coherence tomography angiography parameters in Marfan syndrome: Genetic determinants and associations with cardiovascular manifestations.

PloS one·2026
Same author

From Extraction to Cryobanking: Which Critical Process Parameters Genuinely Improve DPSC Production?

Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Comparison of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods for Gingival Thickness Assessment: Color-Coded Probe Versus Ultrasound Measurements.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Methodological Validation of the PIROP Ultrasound-Based System for Measuring Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Thickness in a Clinical Setting.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 4, 2026

A Mouse Distraction Osteogenesis Model
04:24

A Mouse Distraction Osteogenesis Model

Published on: November 14, 2018

6.0K

Mandibular midline distraction osteogenesis.

Ute Ulrike Botzenhart1, András Végh, Rodica Jianu

  • 1Department of Orthodontics, Fetscherstr. 74, D-01307 Dresden, Germany, Tel: +49-(0)351-4584481; Fax: +49-(0)351-4585318;

Oral Health and Dental Management
|January 7, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Mandibular midline distraction osteogenesis generates bone to treat severe anterior crowding without tooth extraction. This method offers space regaining in reduced jaws, but further research is needed on bone regeneration and stability.

More Related Videos

Creating Rigidly Stabilized Fractures for Assessing Intramembranous Ossification, Distraction Osteogenesis, or Healing of Critical Sized Defects
07:35

Creating Rigidly Stabilized Fractures for Assessing Intramembranous Ossification, Distraction Osteogenesis, or Healing of Critical Sized Defects

Published on: April 11, 2012

17.7K
Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

6.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 4, 2026

A Mouse Distraction Osteogenesis Model
04:24

A Mouse Distraction Osteogenesis Model

Published on: November 14, 2018

6.0K
Creating Rigidly Stabilized Fractures for Assessing Intramembranous Ossification, Distraction Osteogenesis, or Healing of Critical Sized Defects
07:35

Creating Rigidly Stabilized Fractures for Assessing Intramembranous Ossification, Distraction Osteogenesis, or Healing of Critical Sized Defects

Published on: April 11, 2012

17.7K
Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

6.9K

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Regenerative Medicine
  • Dental Implantology

Background:

  • Severe anterior crowding is a common malocclusion often requiring tooth extraction due to bone limitations.
  • Mandibular midline distraction osteogenesis offers a tooth-preserving alternative for space regaining in cases of severe lower jaw crowding.
  • Existing research has not fully explored the bone regeneration, tooth movement, and long-term stability associated with this technique.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the current clinical and biological knowledge regarding bone regeneration and tooth movement through regenerated bone after mandibular midline distraction osteogenesis.
  • To highlight areas requiring further investigation to optimize treatment outcomes and long-term stability.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of clinical and biological studies on mandibular midline distraction osteogenesis.
  • Analysis of bone regeneration, quality, and tooth movement within the regenerated bone area.
  • Evaluation of periodontal health and treatment stability.

Main Results:

  • Mandibular midline distraction osteogenesis facilitates natural bone generation for space regaining.
  • The method allows for tooth movement into the regenerated bone area.
  • Further investigation is needed on bone regeneration speed, quality, periodontal health, and long-term stability.

Conclusions:

  • Mandibular midline distraction osteogenesis is a viable option for treating severe anterior crowding, avoiding tooth extractions.
  • Understanding bone regeneration dynamics and long-term outcomes is crucial for widespread clinical application.
  • Continued research is encouraged to fully elucidate the potential and limitations of this regenerative approach.