Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Theta burst stimulation of extrastriate body area for body perception in anorexia nervosa: a randomized controlled trial.

Translational psychiatry·2026
Same author

New neurons flatten social hierarchies.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Multidomain correlates of burnout: A population-based study using supervised machine learning.

Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology·2026
Same author

How personality functioning shapes symptom development during and after treatment: A random intercept cross lagged panel analysis.

Comprehensive psychiatry·2026
Same author

Long-Term Effectiveness of Inpatient and Day-Hospital Treatment of Eating Disorders in Departments of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy in Germany.

European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association·2026
Same author

Bridging Lab and Life: A Dual-Person Paradigm for Social Interaction Research.

Psychophysiology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 4, 2026

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

14.9K

CT-optimized skin stroking delivered by hand or robot is comparable.

Chantal Triscoli1, Håkan Olausson2, Uta Sailer3

  • 1Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg Gothenburg, Sweden ; Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg Gothenburg, Sweden.

Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
|January 7, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Robot and human touch are comparable in pleasantness, even when the source is unknown. However, handheld stimulation feels more intense at slower speeds, suggesting its use in touch research.

Keywords:
C tactilenerve fibersphysiologypleasant touchrobot touchunmyelinated

More Related Videos

Rod-based Fabrication of Customizable Soft Robotic Pneumatic Gripper Devices for Delicate Tissue Manipulation
07:49

Rod-based Fabrication of Customizable Soft Robotic Pneumatic Gripper Devices for Delicate Tissue Manipulation

Published on: August 2, 2016

8.2K
Haptic/Graphic Rehabilitation: Integrating a Robot into a Virtual Environment Library and Applying it to Stroke Therapy
13:44

Haptic/Graphic Rehabilitation: Integrating a Robot into a Virtual Environment Library and Applying it to Stroke Therapy

Published on: August 8, 2011

15.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 4, 2026

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

14.9K
Rod-based Fabrication of Customizable Soft Robotic Pneumatic Gripper Devices for Delicate Tissue Manipulation
07:49

Rod-based Fabrication of Customizable Soft Robotic Pneumatic Gripper Devices for Delicate Tissue Manipulation

Published on: August 2, 2016

8.2K
Haptic/Graphic Rehabilitation: Integrating a Robot into a Virtual Environment Library and Applying it to Stroke Therapy
13:44

Haptic/Graphic Rehabilitation: Integrating a Robot into a Virtual Environment Library and Applying it to Stroke Therapy

Published on: August 8, 2011

15.7K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Haptics Research
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Investigating the qualitative comparison between manually and mechanically produced tactile stimulation.
  • Assessing the impact of the source (human vs. robot) on tactile perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if pleasant tactile stimulation from a robot is qualitatively similar to human touch.
  • To compare perceived pleasantness and intensity of robotic versus manual tactile stimulation across different velocities.

Main Methods:

  • Thirty-one participants rated pleasantness and intensity of brush strokes (0.3, 3, 30 cm/s) delivered by a robot or hand.
  • Stimulation conditions included awareness and unawareness of the stroke's source.
  • A repeated measures design was employed to analyze the data.

Main Results:

  • Perceived pleasantness ratings were similar for both robot and hand-delivered strokes, irrespective of velocity or source awareness.
  • Intensity ratings were significantly higher for handheld stimulation at 0.3 and 3 cm/s, but not at 30 cm/s.

Conclusions:

  • Robot-generated touch is highly comparable to human touch in terms of pleasantness.
  • Manual stimulation can be a viable alternative to robotic stimulation in touch hedonia studies, especially when robot application is not feasible.