Related Experiment Videos
Afterload reduction in the critically ill: nicergoline versus sodium nitroprusside
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology
|May 1, 1987
Summary
Nicergoline (NIC) improved cardiac output and stroke volume in critically ill patients with low flow states, unlike sodium nitroprusside (NP). NIC
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Pharmacology
- Hemodynamics
Background:
- Critically ill patients often experience low cardiac output during acute illness, necessitating effective vasodilating therapies.
- Existing vasodilators like sodium nitroprusside (NP) may have limitations in improving hemodynamic parameters in such patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of nicergoline (NIC), a selective alpha 1-blocker, with sodium nitroprusside (NP) in improving cardiac output in critically ill patients.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving seven critically ill patients in a low flow state (septic or postoperative).
- Administration of sodium nitroprusside (20-100 micrograms/min) and nicergoline (0.5 to 2.5 mg/min).
- Monitoring of arterial pressure, pulmonary artery balloon-occluded pressure, heart rate, and stroke volume.
Main Results:
- Sodium nitroprusside decreased arterial pressure and pulmonary artery balloon-occluded pressure but did not increase stroke volume or cardiac output.
- Nicergoline significantly increased stroke volume and cardiac output while causing a less significant decrease in arterial pressure.
- Both agents adversely affected arterial blood oxygenation.
Conclusions:
- Nicergoline demonstrates potential as a valuable vasodilating agent in critically ill patients with low cardiac output due to its ability to increase stroke volume and cardiac output.
- NIC's negative chronotropic action may prevent baroreceptor-mediated increases in heart rate, contributing to its distinct hemodynamic effects compared to NP.
- Further investigation into NIC's role in managing acute hemodynamic instability is warranted.