Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
Published on: January 29, 2018
Inverted BMI rather than BMI is a better predictor of DEXA determined body fatness in children
M J Duncan1, C Martins2, G Silva3
1Department of Biomolecular and Sports Science, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
Insights
Inverted Body Mass Index (iBMI) is a comparable predictor of body fatness in children, similar to the traditional Body Mass Index (BMI). This finding suggests iBMI may also be a useful tool for assessing pediatric body composition.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Endocrinology
- Body Composition Analysis
- Anthropometry
Background:
- Body Mass Index (BMI) is widely used to assess body fatness in children, but its distribution may not be normal.
- Alternative anthropometric indices are needed to accurately predict body fatness in pediatric populations.
- Understanding body fatness is crucial for identifying health risks in children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of Body Mass Index (BMI) and inverted BMI (iBMI) as predictors of body fatness in Portuguese children.
- To evaluate the normality of BMI and iBMI distributions in the pediatric population.
- To determine which index, BMI or iBMI, better predicts fat mass index (FMI) when controlling for maturation.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study involving 177 Portuguese children (aged 7-16 years).
- Measurements included height, body mass, BMI (kg/m(2)), and iBMI (cm(2)/kg).
- Fat Mass Index (FMI) was assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; maturation was determined via self-report.
Main Results:
- Both BMI and iBMI showed significant relationships with FMI (P=0.0001).
- BMI distribution was not normal (P=0.0001), whereas iBMI was normally distributed (P>0.05).
- Analysis of covariance indicated that both BMI and iBMI were significant predictors of FMI, controlling for maturation, with iBMI explaining slightly more variance (adjusted R(2)=0.970) than BMI (adjusted R(2)=0.968).
Conclusions:
- iBMI is a comparable proxy for body fatness in children, similar to BMI.
- The normal distribution of iBMI may offer advantages over BMI in certain statistical analyses.
- iBMI presents a potentially valuable alternative for assessing body fatness in pediatric populations.
Abstract:
This study compared body mass index (BMI) and inverted BMI (iBMI) as predictors of body fatness in 177 Portuguese children (149 girls and 96 boys) aged 7-16 years. Participants undertook measures of height and body mass from which BMI (kg/m(2)) and iBMI (cm(2)/kg) were determined. Maturation was determined via self-report and fat mass index (FMI, kg/m(2)) via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Significant relationships were evident between BMI and iBMI and FMI (both P=0.0001). BMI was not normally distributed (P=0.0001) but iBMI was (P>0.05). Analysis of covariance identified that BMI and iBMI, controlling for maturation, were both significant predictors of FMI (both P=0.0001) but that iBMI predicted a slightly greater amount of the variance (adjusted R(2)=0.970) compared with BMI (adjusted R(2)=0.968). This study suggests that iBMI is a similar proxy for body fatness compared with BMI in children.
Related Concept Videos
Obesity
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine Concentration
Drug Dosing: Obese Patients
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Hypodermis

