Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Improved Renal Denervation Mitigated Hypertension Induced by Angiotensin II Infusion
Published on: May 26, 2022
Hypertension in hemodialysis patients treated with atenolol or lisinopril: a randomized controlled trial
Rajiv Agarwal1, Arjun D Sinha, Maria K Pappas
1Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine and Richard L. Roudebush Veterans AdministrationMedical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Insights
In hemodialysis patients, atenolol therapy showed better cardiovascular safety than lisinopril, despite similar left ventricular hypertrophy regression. Atenolol may be superior for preventing cardiovascular events and hospitalizations.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Cardiology
- Clinical Pharmacology
Background:
- Maintenance hemodialysis patients often have hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH).
- LVH is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in this population.
- Optimizing antihypertensive therapy is crucial for managing LVH and improving outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of angiotensin converting enzyme-inhibitor (ACE-I)-based therapy versus beta-blocker-based therapy in regressing left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH).
- To assess the cardiovascular safety and hospitalization rates associated with each antihypertensive regimen in hemodialysis patients.
Main Methods:
- A randomized trial comparing lisinopril (ACE-I) with atenolol (beta-blocker) in 200 maintenance hemodialysis patients.
- Both groups received thrice-weekly post-dialysis treatment, with blood pressure (BP) controlled to <140/90 mmHg.
- Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) change from baseline to 12 months was the primary outcome.
Main Results:
- Both atenolol and lisinopril similarly improved LVMI over 12 months.
- The lisinopril group experienced significantly more serious cardiovascular events (43 vs. 20), myocardial infarctions, strokes, heart failure hospitalizations, and all-cause hospitalizations.
- Cardiovascular safety concerns led to the early termination of the study.
Conclusions:
- Atenolol-based antihypertensive therapy may be superior to lisinopril-based therapy in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and hospitalizations in hemodialysis patients with hypertension and LVH.
- While both agents improved LVH, the safety profile favored atenolol.
- Further research may be warranted to confirm these findings and optimize treatment strategies.
Background:
The purpose of this study was to determine among maintenance hemodialysis patients with echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy and hypertension whether in comparison with a β-blocker-based antihypertensive therapy, an angiotensin converting enzyme-inhibitor-based antihypertensive therapy causes a greater regression of left ventricular hypertrophy.
Methods:
Subjects were randomly assigned to either open-label lisinopril (n = 100) or atenolol (n = 100) each administered three times per week after dialysis. Monthly monitored home blood pressure (BP) was controlled to <140/90 mmHg with medications, dry weight adjustment and sodium restriction. The primary outcome was the change in left ventricular mass index (LVMI) from baseline to 12 months.
Results:
At baseline, 44-h ambulatory BP was similar in the atenolol (151.5/87.1 mmHg) and lisinopril groups, and improved similarly over time in both groups. However, monthly measured home BP was consistently higher in the lisinopril group despite the need for both a greater number of antihypertensive agents and a greater reduction in dry weight. An independent data safety monitoring board recommended termination because of cardiovascular safety. Serious cardiovascular events in the atenolol group occurred in 16 subjects, who had 20 events, and in the lisinopril group in 28 subjects, who had 43 events {incidence rate ratio (IRR) 2.36 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.36-4.23, P = 0.001]}. Combined serious adverse events of myocardial infarction, stroke and hospitalization for heart failure or cardiovascular death in the atenolol group occurred in 10 subjects, who had 11 events and in the lisinopril group in 17 subjects, who had 23 events (IRR 2.29, P = 0.021). Hospitalizations for heart failure were worse in the lisinopril group (IRR 3.13, P = 0.021). All-cause hospitalizations were higher in the lisinopril group [IRR 1.61 (95% CI 1.18-2.19, P = 0.002)]. LVMI improved with time; no difference between drugs was noted.
Conclusions:
Among maintenance dialysis patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy, atenolol-based antihypertensive therapy may be superior to lisinopril-based therapy in preventing cardiovascular morbidity and all-cause hospitalizations. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00582114).
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers
Antihypertensive Drugs: Direct Renin Inhibitors
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure

