Endoscopic resection of gastric neoplasm in solid-organ transplant recipients

Shin Na1, Gin Hyug Lee, Ju Hyung Song

  • 11 Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Asan Digestive Disease Research Institute, Seoul, Korea. 2 Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Korea. 3 Address correspondence to: Gin Hyug Lee, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine Asan Medical Center, Asan Digestive Disease Research Institute, 388-1 Pungnap-2 dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, Korea.

Transplantation
|January 11, 2014
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Endoscopic resection of gastric neoplasm is safe and effective for solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients. This minimally invasive procedure offers high efficacy with manageable complications, avoiding surgical risks.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Transplant Surgery
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients face unique challenges regarding gastric neoplasm management.
  • Assessing the safety and feasibility of endoscopic resection in this population is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the feasibility and safety of endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasm in SOT recipients.
  • To compare outcomes with non-SOT patients undergoing similar procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 17 gastric neoplasm resections in 15 SOT patients (1994-2011).
  • Comparison with a 1:5 matched cohort of non-SOT patients.
  • Evaluation of clinical outcomes, including complication rates.

Main Results:

  • Endoscopic resection was achieved in 15 SOT patients with 17 lesions.
  • En bloc and complete resection rates were 76.5% and 88.2%, respectively.
  • Bleeding occurred in 23.5% of lesions but was managed endoscopically, with no significant difference compared to non-SOT patients.

Conclusions:

  • Endoscopic resection of gastric neoplasm in SOT recipients is feasible and safe, with only manageable complications observed.
  • Graft dysfunction or perforation did not occur.
  • This approach is recommended to avoid surgical morbidity and mortality.