Risk factors: new risk-assessment guidelines-more or less personalized?
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Michael J Blaha1, Roger S Blumenthal1
1The Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease, Carnegie 565A, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Insights
The updated cardiovascular-risk guidelines offer new equations for women and African Americans, including stroke prediction. However, they still rely on traditional factors and may limit personalized assessments for intermediate-risk individuals.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Public Health
- Risk Assessment
Background:
- The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) released updated cardiovascular-risk assessment guidelines.
- These guidelines aim to improve the prediction of cardiovascular events in diverse populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the key changes and limitations of the new ACC/AHA cardiovascular-risk guidelines.
- To assess the impact of updated equations on risk stratification, particularly for women and African Americans.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the updated ACC/AHA cardiovascular-risk guideline equations.
- Comparison of new risk factors and prediction models with previous versions.
- Evaluation of the implications for intermediate-risk patient groups.
Main Results:
- The guidelines incorporate updated equations for women and distinct equations for African Americans.
- Stroke prediction is now included in the risk assessment.
- The equations predominantly rely on traditional risk factors and are heavily influenced by age.
- The intermediate-risk group, crucial for personalized assessment, is potentially reduced.
Conclusions:
- While the updated ACC/AHA guidelines offer improvements in risk prediction for specific demographics, their reliance on traditional factors and age may limit nuanced, personalized risk assessment.
- Further research may be needed to refine risk models for intermediate-risk individuals and incorporate a broader range of risk determinants.
Abstract:
The new ACC/AHA cardiovascular-risk guidelines feature updated equations for women, distinct equations for African–American individuals, and include stroke prediction. However, the equations rely on the same traditional risk factors as previous versions, are driven predominantly by age, and curtail the intermediate-risk group, in which personalized risk assessment is recommended.
Related Concept Videos
Dosage Regimen: Individualization
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Relative Risk
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure

