Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Surface Defects of Remover Retreatment File After Single and Multiple Uses
Published on: October 11, 2024
Effects of NiTi rotary and reciprocating instruments on debris and smear layer scores: an SEM evaluation
Claudio Poggio1, Alberto Dagna, Marco Chiesa
1Department of Endodontics, University of Pavia, Pavia - Italy.
Purpose:
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the cleaning efficacy of 2 different nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary systems: a new single system Reciproc compared with the rotary full sequence Mtwo. The amount of debris and the morphology of smear layer were the parameters for the evaluation of the cleanliness of root canals. The null hypothesis of the study was that there would be no significant difference in debris scores and smear layer scores between the 2 systems.
Methods:
Forty single-rooted freshly extracted teeth were selected and divided into 2 groups. For each group, all root canals were shaped with 2 different NiTi instruments (Mtwo and Reciproc) and irrigated with 5.25% NaOCl and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solutions by 3 trained operators. Specimens were fractured longitudinally and prepared for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis at a standard magnification of ×5,000. The presence/absence of smear layer and the presence/absence of debris at the coronal, middle and apical third of each canal were evaluated using two 5-step scales for scores. Numeric data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U statistical tests, and significance was set at a P value <0.05.
Results:
This study revealed significant differences among the various groups. The Mtwo group presented significantly lower smear layer scores than the Reciproc group (P<0.01) in the middle and apical third of the canal.
Conclusions:
Conventional continuous rotary NiTi instruments associated with 5.25% NaOCl and 17% EDTA solutions seem to be better for obtaining clean dentinal canal walls. Reciprocating instruments leave a higher quantity of smear layer which covers dentinal walls and dentinal tubules.
Insights
The Mtwo rotary system demonstrated superior cleaning efficacy compared to the Reciproc system, resulting in significantly less smear layer and debris in root canals. Continuous rotary instruments offer better canal wall cleanliness.
Area of Science:
- Endodontics
- Dental Materials Science
- Scanning Electron Microscopy
Background:
- Root canal cleanliness is crucial for successful endodontic treatment.
- Nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary instruments are widely used for root canal preparation.
- Smear layer removal is a key factor in achieving effective cleaning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the cleaning efficacy of two NiTi rotary systems: Mtwo and Reciproc.
- To evaluate debris removal and smear layer morphology after root canal preparation.
- To determine if there is a significant difference in cleanliness between the Mtwo and Reciproc systems.
Main Methods:
- Forty single-rooted teeth were divided into two groups for Mtwo and Reciproc instrumentation.
- Root canals were irrigated with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA).
- Specimens were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to assess smear layer and debris.
Main Results:
- The Mtwo system showed significantly lower smear layer scores than the Reciproc system.
- These differences were particularly notable in the middle and apical thirds of the root canal.
- No specific mention of debris scores in the results section, focus on smear layer.
Conclusions:
- Conventional continuous rotary NiTi instruments (Mtwo) are more effective at cleaning dentinal canal walls.
- Reciprocating instruments (Reciproc) tend to leave a higher amount of smear layer.
- Optimal cleaning efficacy is achieved with continuous rotary systems combined with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.
More Related Videos
06:36Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
Published on: March 14, 2025
03:10Pilot In Vitro Study to Assess Cleaning Ability and Effects of Different Decontamination Methods on Implant Surfaces
Published on: November 21, 2025