Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

6.4K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
6.4K
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

3.7K
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
3.7K
Data Collection III01:05

Data Collection III

4.4K
The physical assessment examines the patient for objective data that defines the patient's condition, and aids in formulating the nursing care plan. The purpose of physical assessment is a health status appraisal, which includes identifying health problems, and establishing a database for nursing intervention.
The principles to begin the physical assessment include conducting a comprehensive or problem-related history in a quiet, well-lit room, emphasizing privacy and comfort for the...
4.4K
Nursing Assessment01:29

Nursing Assessment

8.3K
The two sources for collecting information are primary and secondary. After gathering information, interpretation and validation help to complete the data. The purpose of assessment is to establish data with the initial information, to interpret data about the patient's perceived needs and health problems, and to respond to these problems identified.
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments...
8.3K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

12.9K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.9K
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II01:25

Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II

3.8K
Nursing diagnoses represent a problem validated by major defining characteristics. There are four categories of nursing diagnoses: problem-focused, risk, health promotion or wellness, and syndrome. The anatomy of a nursing diagnosis includes three components: problem statement or diagnostic label, defining characteristics, and related factors.
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
3.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Testing Comparability of Gender Bullying Victimization Assessments Through a Latent Class Approach.

Journal of interpersonal violence·2025
Same author

Measurement invariance of the driving inattention scale (ARDES) across 7 countries.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2023
Same author

Parenting in the context of driving: Spanish adaptation of the Family Climate for Road Safety (FCRSS) for parents and children.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2023
Same author

Evidence for Test Validation: A Guide for Practitioners.

Psicothema·2023
Same author

Motorcycle rider error and engagement in distracting activities: A study using the Attention-Related Driving Errors Scale (ARDES-M).

Accident; analysis and prevention·2023
Same author

Understanding the Components and Determinants of Police Attitudes Toward Intervention in Intimate Partner Violence Against Women: A Systematic Review.

Trauma, violence & abuse·2021
Same journal

Personal Recovery in Addictions: Development of a new Assessment Instrument.

Psicothema·2026
Same journal

Internet Habits, Problematic Internet Use, and Online Risk Practices Among Adolescents With ADHD in Spain.

Psicothema·2026
Same journal

Relationship Between Social Connectedness and Quality of Life in Older Adults: An Examination of Sex Differences.

Psicothema·2026
Same journal

The Influence of Gender on Measuring Mental Health Stigma. A Cross-Sectional Vignette Study With the Attribution Questionnaire 9.

Psicothema·2026
Same journal

Comprehensive Assessment of Mental Health Stigma.

Psicothema·2026
Same journal

Psychometric Properties of the Teachers' Responses to Bullying Questionnaire (TRBQ) in Spanish Students.

Psicothema·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 3, 2026

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K

Validating assessments: Introduction to the Special Section.

Stephen Sireci1, José-Luis Padilla

  • 1University of Massachusetts Amherst (USA).

Psicothema
|January 22, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This special issue demonstrates how to build a strong validity argument for tests using five sources of evidence. These methods ensure tests adequately fulfill their intended purposes, enhancing assessment reliability.

More Related Videos

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

7.6K
A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

6.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 3, 2026

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K
Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

7.6K
A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

6.1K

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Educational Measurement
  • Psychological Testing

Background:

  • Test validation is crucial for ensuring assessments accurately measure intended constructs.
  • The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing provide a framework for developing validity arguments.
  • This special issue features international experts detailing test validation approaches.

Discussion:

  • A validity argument integrates evidence from five sources: test content, response processes, internal structure, relations to other variables, and testing consequences.
  • Each source of evidence contributes to the overall justification for test score interpretation and use.
  • Practical examples illustrate the application of these five sources of evidence in real-world test validation.

Key Insights:

  • The five articles offer concrete examples of gathering and analyzing data for each validity evidence source.
  • Demonstrates how diverse evidence converges to support the intended use of test scores.
  • Highlights the practical application of the Standards' validation framework.

Outlook:

  • Future research should continue to explore innovative methods for gathering validity evidence.
  • Emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive validity argument for defensible test use.
  • Promotes the adoption of the Standards' framework for robust test development and evaluation.