Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
Published on: November 16, 2018
Evaluation of horizontal ridge augmentation using beta tricalcium phosphate and demineralized bone matrix: A
Mahmoud A Shalash1, Hatem A Rahman2, Amr A Azim3
1Researcher, Department of Oral Surgery & Medicine, National Research Center, Giza, Egypt.
Beta tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) with Demineralized Bone Matrix (DBM) showed higher bone regeneration than β-TCP alone for maxillary alveolar ridge defects. This combination is effective for localized horizontal ridge augmentation prior to dental implant placement.
Area of Science:
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Regenerative Medicine
- Biomaterials Science
Background:
- Localized horizontal maxillary alveolar ridge deficiencies pose challenges for dental implant placement.
- Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) is a common technique for ridge augmentation.
- Beta tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) and Demineralized Bone Matrix (DBM) are biomaterials used in bone regeneration.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of β-TCP alone versus a combination of β-TCP and DBM for regenerating horizontal maxillary alveolar ridge deficiencies.
- To evaluate bone regeneration using histological and radiographic assessments prior to implant placement.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 20 patients with horizontal maxillary ridge deficiencies.
- Patients were divided into two groups: Group I (β-TCP only) and Group II (β-TCP and DBM).
- Ridge augmentation was performed using GBR principles, followed by a 6-month healing period, bone core retrieval, histological analysis, and Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) for dimensional changes.
Main Results:
- Group II (β-TCP + DBM) demonstrated a significantly higher mean percentage of mineralized bone (68.96%) compared to Group I (β-TCP only) (40.1%).
- Both groups showed an increase in ridge width, with Group II exhibiting slightly greater mean increases crestally (1.37 mm) and apically (2.44 mm), though not statistically significant.
- Histological analysis revealed superior bone mineralization in the group treated with both β-TCP and DBM.
Conclusions:
- The combination of DBM and β-TCP is effective for regenerating localized horizontal maxillary alveolar ridge defects.
- This combination shows promising results for bone augmentation prior to dental implant placement in cases with minimal defects.
- Further research may explore optimal ratios and long-term outcomes of DBM and β-TCP in ridge augmentation.
More Related Videos
08:41Calvarial Model of Bone Augmentation in Rabbit for Assessment of Bone Growth and Neovascularization in Bone Substitution Materials
Published on: August 13, 2019
04:32Half-segmental Diaphyseal Bone Defect Model in Rats for Evaluating Bone Substitute Performance in Load-bearing Regions
Published on: December 30, 2025