Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of Consumer Smartwatch and Research-Grade Accelerometer-Derived Step Counts in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Muscle & nerve·2026
Same author

Objective assessment of physical activity using wearable devices in patients with mild-to-moderate Crohn's disease.

Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology·2026
Same author

Carryover effects of treadmill-based footstrike modification gait retraining on overground running biomechanics.

Journal of sports sciences·2025
Same author

Head Acceleration Events Sustained During High School Wrestling Matches: Grappling With Differences Between Male and Female Adolescents.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2025
Same author

Between-session reliability and minimal detectable difference of peak tibial acceleration during running on an indoor track.

Sports biomechanics·2025
Same author

Test-retest reliability of a dance-specific jump test using wearable technology among university contemporary dancers.

Journal of biomechanics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 3, 2026

Dissection, MicroCT Scanning and Morphometric Analyses of the Baculum
04:32

Dissection, MicroCT Scanning and Morphometric Analyses of the Baculum

Published on: March 19, 2017

7.3K

A novel method to evaluate error in anatomical marker placement using a modified generalized Procrustes analysis.

Sean T Osis1, Blayne A Hettinga, Shari L Macdonald

  • 1a Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary , Calgary , Canada.

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
|January 28, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Standardizing gait analysis marker placement is crucial for reliable biomechanical research. This study quantifies marker placement errors using morphometric methods, revealing systematic biases despite training improvements.

Keywords:
gait analysismorphometricsmotion analysis

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities
07:13

Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities

Published on: October 27, 2023

2.0K
Measurement of Dynamic Scapular Kinematics Using an Acromion Marker Cluster to Minimize Skin Movement Artifact
10:07

Measurement of Dynamic Scapular Kinematics Using an Acromion Marker Cluster to Minimize Skin Movement Artifact

Published on: February 10, 2015

18.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 3, 2026

Dissection, MicroCT Scanning and Morphometric Analyses of the Baculum
04:32

Dissection, MicroCT Scanning and Morphometric Analyses of the Baculum

Published on: March 19, 2017

7.3K
Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities
07:13

Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities

Published on: October 27, 2023

2.0K
Measurement of Dynamic Scapular Kinematics Using an Acromion Marker Cluster to Minimize Skin Movement Artifact
10:07

Measurement of Dynamic Scapular Kinematics Using an Acromion Marker Cluster to Minimize Skin Movement Artifact

Published on: February 10, 2015

18.6K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanical research
  • Human movement analysis
  • Clinical biomechanics

Background:

  • Standardization of data collection and analysis is a persistent challenge in evolving biomechanical research.
  • Marker placement in gait analysis is the primary source of error, yet lacks standardized quantification methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To apply morphometric methods for quantifying discrepancies in marker placement during gait analysis.
  • To improve the reliability of gait analysis through standardized error quantification.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized generalized Procrustes analysis (GPA) and nearest neighbour comparison.
  • Employed principal component analysis to identify variances in an extensive expert dataset (n=340).
  • Evaluated novice marker placements (n=55) against the expert dataset using a modified GPA.

Main Results:

  • Quantitative differences in marker placement between novice and expert data were identified.
  • Training improved marker placement consistency, but systematic biases persisted.
  • Morphometric methods effectively quantified marker placement errors in gait analysis.

Conclusions:

  • The developed morphometric approach provides a standardized method for quantifying marker placement errors in gait analysis.
  • Addressing systematic biases in marker placement is essential for enhancing the reliability and accuracy of biomechanical research.
  • Further refinement of training protocols may be necessary to minimize residual systematic errors.