Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

07:53
Interphase Fluorescence in situ Hybridization of Bone Marrow Smears of Multiple Myeloma
Published on: April 15, 2022
4.2K
Three-dimensional Nuclear Telomere Organization in Multiple Myeloma
Ludger Klewes1, Rhea Vallente1, Eric Dupas1
1Manitoba Institute of Cell Biology, University of Manitoba, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Translational Oncology
|January 28, 2014
Summary
Nuclear telomere structure analysis differentiated multiple myeloma (MM) stages. This 3D telomere profiling may aid in predicting disease progression and personalizing treatment for monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and MM patients.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genetics
- Cell Biology
Background:
- Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell malignancy preceded by monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS).
- Predicting disease progression and treatment response in MGUS and MM remains challenging.
- Nuclear telomeric architecture is a potential biomarker for disease state.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the utility of three-dimensional (3D) telomere analysis in differentiating disease stages of multiple myeloma (MM).
- To explore the potential of 3D telomere profiling for risk stratification and personalized treatment decisions in MM.
- To assess if telomeric profiles differ between blood and bone marrow samples in MM patients.
Main Methods:
- Collected samples from patients diagnosed with MGUS, MM, and relapsed MM.
- Performed three-dimensional (3D) telomere analysis.
- Quantified telomere signal intensity, number of telomere aggregates, nuclear volume, and telomere distribution (a/c ratio).
Main Results:
- Telomeric profiles successfully differentiated between MGUS, MM, and relapsed MM stages.
- Identical telomeric profiles were observed in myeloma cells from both blood and bone marrow aspirates.
- Specific telomere parameters (intensity, aggregates, volume, distribution) were key discriminators.
Conclusions:
- 3D telomere profiling is a promising method for distinguishing between different stages of multiple myeloma.
- This technique holds potential for improving risk stratification and guiding personalized treatment strategies for MM patients.
- Telomere analysis in blood samples may be a viable alternative to bone marrow analysis for MM assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Telomeres and Telomerase
23.1K
In eukaryotic DNA replication, a single-stranded DNA fragment remains at the end of a chromosome after the removal of the final primer. This section of DNA cannot be replicated in the same manner as the rest of the strand because there is no 3’ end to which the newly synthesized DNA can attach. This non-replicated fragment results in gradual loss of the chromosomal DNA during each cell duplication. Additionally, it can induce a DNA damage response by enzymes that recognize single-stranded...
23.1K
The Nucleolus
8.6K
The nucleolus is the most prominent substructure of the nucleus. When it was first discovered, it was considered to be an isolated organelle that forms fibrils and granules. In 1931, the relationship between the nucleolus and chromosomes was first described by Heitz. He observed that the appearance and size of nucleolus varies depending on the stage of the cell cycle. He also noticed constricted regions on different chromosomes clustered together at definite cell cycle stages. These regions,...
8.6K
Histone Variants at the Centromere
4.0K
Histone variants are the histone proteins with structural and sequence variations. These variants may be regarded as “mutant” forms that replace their canonical histone counterparts in the nucleosomes. Specific post-translational modifications on the histone variants enable further chromatin complexity and regulate tissue-specific gene expression. The most common histone variants are from histone H2A, H2B, and linker histone H1 families. However, several variants of histone H3...
4.0K
Chromatin Position Affects Gene Expression
22.5K
Chromatin is the massive complex of DNA and proteins packaged inside the nucleus. The complexity of chromatin folding and how it is packaged inside the nucleus greatly influences access to genetic information. Generally, the nucleus' periphery is considered transcriptionally repressive, while the cell's interior is considered a transcriptionally active area.
Topologically Associated Domains (TADs)
The 3-dimensional positioning of chromatin in the nucleus influences the...
Topologically Associated Domains (TADs)
The 3-dimensional positioning of chromatin in the nucleus influences the...
22.5K

