Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Psilocybin's kinematic effect on manual dexterity.

Psychopharmacology·2026
Same author

Development of the MDMA-Assisted Psychotherapy Side Effects Tool (M-SET): a Delphi study.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Pulvinar-posterior superior temporal sulcus connectivity contributes to non-conscious emotion processing in affective blindsight.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same author

Psychedelics in functional disorders: A scoping review.

Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry·2026
Same author

Optimizing Radiology Resident Competency in Pediatric Musculoskeletal Radiograph Interpretation.

Academic radiology·2026
Same author

Psilocybin-assisted physiotherapy for refractory motor functional neurological disorder: protocol for a randomised dose-comparison pilot study.

Acta neuropsychiatrica·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 3, 2026

Technique and Considerations in the Use of 4x1 Ring High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation HD-tDCS
15:05

Technique and Considerations in the Use of 4x1 Ring High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation HD-tDCS

Published on: July 14, 2013

40.5K

Transcranial direct current stimulation: five important issues we aren't discussing (but probably should be).

Jared C Horvath1, Olivia Carter1, Jason D Forte1

  • 1Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
|January 31, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) shows potential for cognitive enhancement, but research must address variability, reliability, and technical issues. Further investigation is needed to establish its efficacy and understand its mechanisms.

Keywords:
efficacymechanisms of actionreliabilitytranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)variability

More Related Videos

Simultaneous Application of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation during Virtual Reality Exposure
08:20

Simultaneous Application of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation during Virtual Reality Exposure

Published on: January 18, 2021

6.3K
Updated Technique for Reliable, Easy, and Tolerated Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Including Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
10:11

Updated Technique for Reliable, Easy, and Tolerated Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Including Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Published on: January 3, 2020

13.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 3, 2026

Technique and Considerations in the Use of 4x1 Ring High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation HD-tDCS
15:05

Technique and Considerations in the Use of 4x1 Ring High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation HD-tDCS

Published on: July 14, 2013

40.5K
Simultaneous Application of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation during Virtual Reality Exposure
08:20

Simultaneous Application of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation during Virtual Reality Exposure

Published on: January 18, 2021

6.3K
Updated Technique for Reliable, Easy, and Tolerated Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Including Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
10:11

Updated Technique for Reliable, Easy, and Tolerated Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Including Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Published on: January 3, 2020

13.3K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Neuromodulation

Background:

  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is frequently promoted for cognitive and behavioral enhancement.
  • However, the evidence supporting these claims is often inconclusive, with significant experimental and technical issues frequently overlooked in the literature.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine five under-discussed issues in tDCS research: inter-subject variability, intra-subject reliability, sham stimulation and blinding, interference effects, and electric current influences.
  • To stimulate a dialogue regarding the efficacy, reliability, and mechanistic underpinnings of tDCS.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review focusing on experimental and technical challenges in tDCS research.
  • Analysis of five key areas: inter-subject variability, intra-subject reliability, sham control and blinding, interference phenomena, and factors influencing current flow.

Main Results:

  • Significant inter-subject variability and a lack of data on intra-subject reliability complicate the interpretation of tDCS effects.
  • Inadequate sham stimulation and blinding practices, potential interference from concurrent activities, and overlooked variables affecting current density are prevalent issues.
  • These factors collectively challenge the established efficacy and mechanistic understanding of tDCS.

Conclusions:

  • The current literature on tDCS often neglects critical experimental and technical factors, impacting the validity of enhancement claims.
  • Addressing issues of variability, reliability, control, interference, and current flow is essential for advancing the field.
  • Further research and open discussion are necessary to establish the true efficacy and reliable application of tDCS.