Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

14.6K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
14.6K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

11.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
11.2K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

974
974
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

93.9K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
93.9K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

8.3K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
8.3K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

8.7K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
8.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hybridizing traditional and next-generation reservoir computing to accurately and efficiently forecast dynamical systems.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2024
Same author

Backpropagation algorithms and Reservoir Computing in Recurrent Neural Networks for the forecasting of complex spatiotemporal dynamics.

Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society·2020
Same author

UDS-test with freon 11 (R-11).

Environmental science and pollution research international·2013
Same author

Analysis of multiple physical parameters for mechanical phenotyping of living cells.

European biophysics journal : EBJ·2013
Same author

Risk factors associated with surgical site infections following vascular surgery at a German university hospital.

Epidemiology and infection·2012
Same author

Path to fracture in granular flows: dynamics of contact networks.

Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics·2011
Same journal

Tension on dsDNA bound to ssDNA-RecA filaments may play an important role in driving efficient and accurate homology recognition and strand exchange.

Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics·2016
Same journal

Publisher's Note: Amplitude-phase coupling drives chimera states in globally coupled laser networks [Phys. Rev. E 91, 040901(R) (2015)].

Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics·2016
Same journal

Erratum: Shapes of sedimenting soft elastic capsules in a viscous fluid [Phys. Rev. E 92, 033003 (2015)].

Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics·2016
Same journal

Erratum: Attenuation of excitation decay rate due to collective effect [Phys. Rev. E 90, 022142 (2014)].

Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics·2016
Same journal

Publisher's Note: Role of connectivity and fluctuations in the nucleation of calcium waves in cardiac cells [Phys. Rev. E 92, 052715 (2015)].

Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics·2016
Same journal

Publisher's Note: Lattice Boltzmann approach for complex nonequilibrium flows [Phys. Rev. E 92, 043308 (2015)].

Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics·2016
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 3, 2026

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

1.7K

Robustness of network measures to link errors.

J Platig1, E Ott2, M Girvan2

  • 1Institute for Research in Electronics and Applied Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA and Metabolism Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA and Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

Physical Review. E, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics
|February 4, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Link errors in complex networks can significantly impact node importance measures. This study models inaccuracies and assesses the robustness of degree, betweenness, and dynamical importance centrality, finding them to be sensitive to such errors.

More Related Videos

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.6K
Network Analysis of Foramen Ovale Electrode Recordings in Drug-resistant Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Patients
09:32

Network Analysis of Foramen Ovale Electrode Recordings in Drug-resistant Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Patients

Published on: December 18, 2016

13.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 3, 2026

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

1.7K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.6K
Network Analysis of Foramen Ovale Electrode Recordings in Drug-resistant Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Patients
09:32

Network Analysis of Foramen Ovale Electrode Recordings in Drug-resistant Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Patients

Published on: December 18, 2016

13.7K

Area of Science:

  • Network science
  • Complex systems analysis
  • Computational graph theory

Background:

  • Network measures are crucial for identifying important nodes in complex networks.
  • The impact of link inaccuracies (false or missing links) on these measures is not well understood.
  • Robustness of centrality measures under noisy network data is a key challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the robustness of commonly used node centrality measures against link errors.
  • To quantify the effect of false and missing links on degree centrality, betweenness centrality, and dynamical importance.
  • To provide a theoretical and computational framework for understanding network measure reliability.

Main Methods:

  • Development of two stochastic models for simulating false and missing links.
  • Numerical simulations to evaluate the performance of centrality measures under varying error rates.
  • Analytical theory development to complement and validate simulation results.

Main Results:

  • Degree centrality, betweenness centrality, and dynamical importance show varying degrees of sensitivity to link errors.
  • Simulations and analytical theory show good agreement in predicting the impact of link inaccuracies.
  • The study quantifies the degradation of centrality measures due to network noise.

Conclusions:

  • Node centrality measures are not inherently robust to common link errors in complex networks.
  • Understanding the impact of link inaccuracies is essential for reliable network analysis.
  • The developed models and theory provide a basis for assessing and improving the robustness of network measures.