A tale of two "forests": random forest machine learning AIDS tropical forest carbon mapping
Joseph Mascaro1, Gregory P Asner1, David E Knapp1
1Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Plos One
|February 4, 2014
Summary
Random Forest machine learning with spatial context significantly improved tropical forest carbon stock mapping in the Western Amazon. This approach enhances accuracy for climate change mitigation efforts like REDD+.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Remote Sensing
- Machine Learning
Background:
- Accurate tropical forest carbon stock mapping is crucial for climate change mitigation mechanisms like REDD+.
- Remotely-sensed data and machine learning offer potential for improved carbon mapping.
- Traditional stratification methods have limitations in spatial accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of the Random Forest algorithm for upscaling airborne LiDAR-based carbon estimates.
- To compare Random Forest with and without spatial context against traditional stratification.
- To assess the suitability of Random Forest for spatially-explicit carbon stock mapping in the Western Amazon.
Main Methods:
- Airborne LiDAR data was used to estimate forest carbon stocks.
- Random Forest machine learning algorithm was applied with and without spatial coordinates (x, y).
- A large-scale validation (8 million hectares) was performed, comparing results to regional stratification.
Main Results:
- Random Forest incorporating spatial context explained 59% of carbon estimates, outperforming stratification (37%) and Random Forest without spatial context (43%).
- The inclusion of spatial context improved Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) from 33 to 26 Mg C ha(-1).
- This represents a 60% improvement in explained variation compared to models without spatial context.
Conclusions:
- Spatial context is a critical factor for improving Random Forest model performance in carbon stock mapping.
- This approach offers substantially improved carbon stock modeling for climate change mitigation.
- The findings support the use of spatially-explicit Random Forest for REDD+ and similar initiatives.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Survival Tree
499
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
499
Softwoods and Hardwoods
859
Softwoods and hardwoods, derived from different types of trees, are distinguished by their leaf structures and cellular compositions, each serving unique purposes in construction and manufacturing. Softwoods come from cone-bearing trees with needle-like leaves and are predominantly composed of longitudinal cells called tracheids and a smaller proportion of radial cells known as rays. Due to their cellular structure, softwoods are commonly used in construction for structural frames, sheathing,...
859
The Carbon Cycle
32.8K
Carbon is the basis of all organic matter on Earth, and is recycled through the ecosystem in two primary processes: one in which carbon is exchanged among living organisms, and one in which carbon is cycled over long periods of time through fossilized organic remains, weathering of rocks, and volcanic activity. Human activities, including increased agricultural practices and the burning of fossil fuels, has greatly affected the balance of the natural carbon cycle.
32.8K
Habitat Fragmentation
15.7K
Habitat fragmentation describes the division of a more extensive, continuous habitat into smaller, discontinuous areas. Human activities such as land conversion, as well as slower geological processes leading to changes in the physical environment, are the two leading causes of habitat fragmentation. The fragmentation process typically follows the same steps: perforation, dissection, fragmentation, shrinkage, and attrition.
15.7K


