Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
Published on: December 9, 2015
Accounting for sampling error when inferring population synchrony from time-series data: a Bayesian state-space
Hugues Santin-Janin1, Bernard Hugueny2, Philippe Aubry3
1Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage, Direction des Études et de la Recherche, Le Perray-en-Yvelines, France ; Université de Lyon, Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Villeurbanne, France.
Sampling error in population data can bias synchrony estimates, potentially overemphasizing intrinsic factors. This study presents a state-space model to accurately quantify population synchrony, accounting for sampling uncertainty.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Population Dynamics
- Statistical Modeling
Background:
- Population size data often contain sampling errors, which can bias ecological models.
- Ignoring sampling error in population dynamics can lead to inaccurate parameter estimation, such as density-dependence.
- This bias can distort the understanding of factors driving population synchrony, like the Moran effect versus dispersal.
Purpose of the Study:
- To demonstrate the bias introduced by neglecting sampling error in population synchrony studies.
- To introduce a novel space-state modeling approach for quantifying population synchrony that explicitly incorporates sampling error.
- To provide practical examples and tools for researchers to apply this improved methodology.
Main Methods:
- Developed a space-state modeling framework to explicitly account for sampling error in population size data.
- Applied the model to empirical datasets with pre-estimated and jointly estimated sampling variances.
- Compared the results from the new approach with a standard method that ignores sampling variance.
Main Results:
- Neglecting sampling variance can obscure true population synchrony patterns.
- The classical estimator for synchrony strength is biased downward when sampling errors are independent.
- Averaging population size replicates is an insufficient method to correct for this bias.
Conclusions:
- The proposed state-space model accurately quantifies population synchrony, even with over-dispersed count data.
- This flexible approach accounts for uncertainty in population size estimates, crucial for field studies.
- A user-friendly R-program and tutorial are provided to facilitate the adoption of this method in ecological research.
More Related Videos
07:59Author Spotlight: Alignment of Synchronized Time-Series Data Using the Characterizing Loss of Cell Cycle Synchrony Model for Cross-Experiment Comparisons
Published on: June 9, 2023
09:27Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
Published on: October 13, 2018
Related Concept Videos
State Space Representation
Consider an RLC circuit, a...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Sampling Continuous Time Signal
In the...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Sampling Methods: Overview
In analytical chemistry, the choice of...