Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
Published on: February 10, 2014
Clinical testing of an alternate method of inserting bone-implanted fiducial markers
Ramya Balachandran1, Mark A Fritz, Mary S Dietrich
1Department of Otolaryngology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1215 21st Avenue South, MCE 7209, South Tower, Nashville, TN , 37232, USA, ramya.balachandran@vanderbilt.edu.
Background:
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery utilizes image guidance via bone-implanted fiducial markers to achieve the desired submillimetric accuracy and to provide means for attaching microstereotactic frames. For maximal benefit, the markers must be inserted to the correct depth since over-insertion leads to stripping and under-insertion leads to instability.
Purpose:
The purpose of the study was to test clinically a depth-release drive system, the PosiSeat™, versus manual insertion (pilot hole followed by manual screwing until tactile determined correct seating) for implanting fiducial markers into the bone.
Methods:
With institutional review board approval, the PosiSeat™ was used to implant markers in 15 DBS patients (57 fiducials). On post-insertion CT scans, the depth of the gap between the shoulder of the fiducial markers and the closest bone surface was measured. Similar depth measurements were performed on the CT scans of 64 DBS patients (250 fiducials), who underwent manual fiducial insertion.
Results:
Median of shoulder-to-bone distance for PosiSeat™ and manual insertion group were 0.03 and 1.06 mm, respectively. Fifty percent of the fiducials had the shoulder-to-bone distances within 0.01-0.09 mm range for the PosiSeat group and 0.04-1.45 mm range for the manual insertion group. These differences were statistically significant.
Conclusions:
A depth-release drive system achieves more consistent placement of bone-implanted fiducial markers than manual insertion.
More Related Videos
05:54Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
07:13Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities
Published on: October 27, 2023