Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking
Published on: November 17, 2023
Prognostic utility of the cell cycle progression score generated from biopsy in men treated with prostatectomy
Jay T Bishoff1, Stephen J Freedland1, Leah Gerber1
1Intermountain Healthcare (JTB), Salt Lake City, Utah; Myriad Genetics, Inc. (JR, WW, ZS, ET, JP, AY, AG, JSL, MB), Salt Lake City, Utah; Department of Surgery, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center (SJF, LG), Durham, North Carolina; Department of Surgery (Urology) (SJF, LG), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Pathology (SJF), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center (PT, MG), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Institute for Pathology (GS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Purpose:
The cell cycle progression score is associated with prostate cancer outcomes in various clinical settings. However, previous studies of men treated with radical prostatectomy evaluated cell cycle progression scores generated from resected tumor tissue. We evaluated the prognostic usefulness of the score derived from biopsy specimens in men treated with radical prostatectomy.
Materials And Methods:
We evaluated the cell cycle progression score in cohorts of patients from the Martini Clinic (283), Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center (176) and Intermountain Healthcare (123). The score was derived from simulated biopsy (Martini Clinic) or diagnostic biopsy (Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Intermountain Healthcare) and evaluated for an association with biochemical recurrence and metastatic disease.
Results:
In all 3 cohorts the cell cycle progression score was associated with biochemical recurrence and metastatic disease. The association with biochemical recurrence remained significant after adjusting for other prognostic clinical variables. On combined analysis of all cohorts (total 582 patients) the score was a strong predictor of biochemical recurrence on univariate analysis (HR per score unit 1.60, 95% CI 1.35-1.90, p=2.4×10(-7)) and multivariate analysis (HR per score unit 1.47, 95% CI 1.23-1.76, p=4.7×10(-5)). Although there were few events (12), the cell cycle progression score was the strongest predictor of metastatic disease on univariate analysis (HR per score unit 5.35, 95% CI 2.89-9.92, p=2.1×10(-8)) and after adjusting for clinical variables (HR per score unit 4.19, 95% CI 2.08-8.45, p=8.2×10(-6)).
Conclusions:
The cell cycle progression score derived from a biopsy sample was associated with adverse outcomes after surgery. These results indicate that the score can be used at disease diagnosis to better define patient prognosis and enable more appropriate clinical care.
More Related Videos
13:19Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer
Published on: November 2, 2013
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024