Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

1.3K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
1.3K
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

1.2K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.2K
Electromagnetic Wave Equation01:24

Electromagnetic Wave Equation

2.6K
Maxwell's equations for electromagnetic fields are related to source charges, either static or moving. These fields act on a test charge, whose trajectory can thus be determined using suitable boundary conditions. The objective of electromagnetism is thus theoretically complete.
However, although electric and magnetic fields were first introduced as mathematical constructs to simplify the description of mutual forces between charges, a natural question emerges from Maxwell's equations:...
2.6K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.5K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.5K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.2K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.2K
The Quantum-Mechanical Model of an Atom02:45

The Quantum-Mechanical Model of an Atom

47.1K
Shortly after de Broglie published his ideas that the electron in a hydrogen atom could be better thought of as being a circular standing wave instead of a particle moving in quantized circular orbits, Erwin Schrödinger extended de Broglie’s work by deriving what is now known as the Schrödinger equation. When Schrödinger applied his equation to hydrogen-like atoms, he was able to reproduce Bohr’s expression for the energy and, thus, the Rydberg formula governing...
47.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prediction of blood-brain barrier-penetrating peptides using B3BPFN.

Frontiers in molecular biosciences·2026
Same author

EnAcrPred: A robust ensemble machine learning framework for identifying anti-CRISPR proteins.

Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society·2026
Same author

Dynamics of the SS Loop Regulates SARM1's Catalysis.

ACS chemical neuroscience·2026
Same author

Contrastive representation learning and capsule networks enable accurate identification of ferroptosis-related proteins.

Journal of cheminformatics·2026
Same author

GeoCTP: Structure-aware Prediction of Multifunctional Cancer Therapy Peptides via Graph Transformer and Contrastive Learning.

IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics·2026
Same author

ANIA: an inception-attention network for predicting minimum inhibitory concentration of antimicrobial peptides.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Metastable excited states of iodide-alkyl halide cluster anions: Insights from photodetachment spectroscopy and non-Hermitian quantum chemistry.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Pressure-induced thermal expansion anomalies in dhcp iron hydride associated with magnetoelastic coupling.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Seniority eigenstate configuration interaction.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

A data-driven modeling study on the accurate identification of Doppler-free saturated absorption spectra in diatomic tellurium (130Te2).

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Anharmonic phonons via quantum thermal bath simulations.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Quantum simulation of alignment dependent differential cross sections in co-propagating molecular beams at cold collision energies.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 3, 2026

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs
06:42

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs

Published on: June 8, 2018

9.0K

The exact wavefunction factorization of a vibronic coupling system.

Ying-Chih Chiang1, Shachar Klaiman1, Frank Otto1

  • 1Theoretische Chemie, Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 229, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

The Journal of Chemical Physics
|February 12, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We found that the exact wavefunction can be factored into electronic and nuclear parts for conical intersection systems. This factorization reveals nodeless nuclear wavefunctions related to adiabatic approximations, even with non-adiabatic coupling.

More Related Videos

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
08:04

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids

Published on: May 27, 2020

7.5K
A Photonic System for Generating Unconditional Polarization-Entangled Photons Based on Multiple Quantum Interference
07:56

A Photonic System for Generating Unconditional Polarization-Entangled Photons Based on Multiple Quantum Interference

Published on: September 5, 2019

9.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 3, 2026

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs
06:42

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs

Published on: June 8, 2018

9.0K
Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
08:04

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids

Published on: May 27, 2020

7.5K
A Photonic System for Generating Unconditional Polarization-Entangled Photons Based on Multiple Quantum Interference
07:56

A Photonic System for Generating Unconditional Polarization-Entangled Photons Based on Multiple Quantum Interference

Published on: September 5, 2019

9.8K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum chemistry
  • Molecular dynamics
  • Theoretical chemistry

Background:

  • Conical intersections are crucial in understanding photochemical reactions and molecular dynamics.
  • The exact factorization of the wavefunction is a complex problem in quantum mechanics.
  • Adiabatic approximations simplify calculations but may not capture all non-adiabatic effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the exact wavefunction factorization for a model conical intersection system.
  • To explore the properties of the resulting factorized potentials and nuclear wavefunctions.
  • To clarify the relationship between exact wavefunction factorization and the adiabatic approximation.

Main Methods:

  • Investigated the exact wavefunction as a product of electronic and nuclear wavefunctions.
  • Analyzed a model system exhibiting a conical intersection.
  • Examined the symmetry-breaking effects of coupling modes.

Main Results:

  • Discovered exact factorized spiky potentials and nodeless nuclear wavefunctions.
  • Confirmed that the exact factorized potential preserves symmetry breaking.
  • Observed a strong correlation between nodeless wavefunctions and adiabatic nuclear eigenfunctions, even under non-adiabatic coupling.

Conclusions:

  • The exact wavefunction can be factorized into electronic and nuclear components for conical intersection systems.
  • Nodeless nuclear wavefunctions arising from factorization are closely linked to adiabatic approximations.
  • This finding bridges the gap between exact factorization methods and traditional adiabatic approaches in quantum dynamics.