Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
Comparison of high-dose-rate (192)Ir source strength measurements using equipment with traceability to different
Asa Carlsson Tedgren1, Hans Bjerke2, Jan-Erik Grindborg3
1Swedish Radiation Safety Authority, Stockholm, Sweden; Radiation Physics, Department of Medical and Health Sciences and Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping, Sweden.
Purpose:
According to the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group No. 43 (TG-43) formalism used for dose calculation in brachytherapy treatment planning systems, the absolute level of absorbed dose is determined through coupling with the measurable quantity air-kerma strength or the numerically equal reference air-kerma rate (RAKR). Traceability to established standards is important for accurate dosimetry in laying the ground for reliable comparisons of results and safety in adoption of new treatment protocols. The purpose of this work was to compare the source strength for a high-dose rate (HDR) (192)Ir source as measured using equipment traceable to different standard laboratories in Europe and the United States.
Methods And Materials:
Source strength was determined for one HDR (192)Ir source using four independent systems, all with traceability to different primary or interim standards in the United States and Europe.
Results:
The measured HDR (192)Ir source strengths varied by 0.8% and differed on average from the vendor value by 0.3%. Measurements with the well chambers were 0.5% ± 0.1% higher than the vendor-provided source strength. Measurements with the Farmer chamber were 0.7% lower than the average well chamber results and 0.2% lower than the vendor-provided source strength. All of these results were less than the reported source calibration uncertainties (k=2) of each measurement system.
Conclusions:
In view of the uncertainties in ion chamber calibration factors, the maximum difference in source strength found in this study is small and confirms the consistency between calibration standards in use for HDR (192)Ir brachytherapy.
Related Concept Videos
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Lab
Biological Effects of Radiation
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Radiation and Light Sources
Two common narrow-range 'line' sources used in AAS are hollow-cathode lamps (HCLs) and...
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Overview
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Instrumentation
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET

