Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

The Use of the Puzzle Box as a Means of Assessing the Efficacy of Environmental Enrichment
Published on: December 29, 2014
Efficiency of augmented p-rep designs in multi-environmental trials
Jens Moehring1, Emlyn R Williams, Hans-Peter Piepho
1Institute for Crop Science, Bioinformatics Unit, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
For early generation testing in plant breeding, unreplicated designs are most efficient for multi-environmental trials (METs). If replication is necessary, augmented partially replicated (p-rep) designs are superior to standard augmented and replicated designs.
Area of Science:
- Agricultural Science
- Biometrical Genetics
- Plant Breeding
Background:
- Augmented designs with unreplicated entries are common in early generation testing for plant breeding due to seed limitations.
- Partially replicated (p-rep) designs, which replace check plots with replicated entries, offer an alternative for multi-environmental trials (METs).
- A gap exists in comparing the efficiency of augmented p-rep designs against traditional augmented and replicated designs within METs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficiency of augmented p-rep designs with augmented and replicated designs in multi-environmental trials (METs).
- To evaluate the impact of different error models and entry effect assumptions (fixed vs. random) on design efficiency.
- To investigate the influence of correlated entry effects, relevant to genomic selection, on design performance.
Main Methods:
- Simulated genetic effects and allocated them to plot yields in triticale and maize uniformity trials using four designs: unreplicated, augmented, replicated, and augmented p-rep.
- Varied the number of environments while keeping the number of entries and total plots constant.
- Incorporated simulations with different error models (spatial vs. randomization-based) and entry effect assumptions (fixed vs. random), including correlated effects for triticale data.
Main Results:
- Unreplicated and augmented p-rep designs demonstrated an advantage in efficiency.
- A preference for using random entry effects was observed, particularly when effects were correlated, reflecting relationships among entries.
- Spatial error models offered minor advantages over purely randomization-based models.
Conclusions:
- Unreplicated designs are the most efficient for multi-environmental trials (METs) when seed is limited.
- Augmented p-rep designs are more efficient than augmented and replicated designs when replication per environment is required.
- The use of random entry effects, especially with correlated effects, is recommended for improved efficiency in plant breeding METs.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Medium Optimization
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Group Design
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Factorial Design
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.

