Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Inattention over time-on-task: the role of motivation in mitigating temporal increases in media multitasking.

Frontiers in cognition·2026

Same author

Author Correction: Attention in hindsight: Using stimulated recall to capture dynamic fluctuations in attentional engagement.

Behavior research methods·2026

Same author

The Effects of Anticipating Metacognitive Judgments about Mind-Wandering.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

Same author

The effects of cannabis on mind-wandering.

Heliyon·2026

Same author

Agentic aspects of attentional disengagement.

Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale·2025

Same author

Attention in our digital ecosystem: The five interactive components that drive media multitasking.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025

Same journal

Low prevalence targets are primarily missed due to mind wandering.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

Same journal

An introduction to the special issue celebrating Mary A. Peterson.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

Same journal

Properties of the threshold stimulus exposure duration (TSED) measure of visual search efficiency.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

Same journal

Auditory selective attention in depth: Investigating directional dependency across front, lateral, and rear spaces.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

Same journal

Dissociations between stereoacuity and visual acuity with binocular night vision goggles.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

Same journal

Reward-based prioritization and perceptual feature effects on attentional flexibility in working memory.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 2, 2026

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Comparing target detection errors in visual search and manually-assisted search.

Grayden J F Solman¹, Kersondra Hickey, Daniel Smilek

¹BAR Lab - Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada, grayden@psych.ubc.ca.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics

|February 21, 2014

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Low prevalence targets increase search errors in both visual search and manual item unpacking. This reduced diligence affects how people search, leading to more missed targets, especially when individual items are not inspected thoroughly.

More Related Videos

Simultaneous Eye Tracking and Single-Neuron Recordings in Human Epilepsy Patients

Simultaneous Eye Tracking and Single-Neuron Recordings in Human Epilepsy Patients

Published on: June 17, 2019

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 2, 2026

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Simultaneous Eye Tracking and Single-Neuron Recordings in Human Epilepsy Patients

Simultaneous Eye Tracking and Single-Neuron Recordings in Human Epilepsy Patients

Published on: June 17, 2019

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Human-Computer Interaction
Visual Perception

Background:

The prevalence effect describes how target detection accuracy decreases when targets are rare.
Previous research indicates that manual interaction with items can introduce unique search errors.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the impact of target prevalence on search accuracy in both static visual search and manually-assisted search tasks.
To compare the nature of search errors under varying prevalence conditions and task types.

Main Methods:

Replication of the prevalence effect in visual search and item unpacking tasks.
Analysis of item movements during manually-assisted search and eye movements during static visual search.
Quantification of target misses and unpacking errors under low and high prevalence conditions.

Main Results:

The prevalence effect was replicated, with significantly more target misses occurring under low prevalence conditions.
Unpacking errors, where the target is moved without notice, also increased under low prevalence.
Search errors differed based on task: visual search misses often involved failure to inspect all items, while manual search misses involved inadequate inspection of individual items.

Conclusions:

Low target prevalence broadly reduces search diligence, but the specific manifestation of this reduced diligence depends on the task.
In manually-assisted search, a high proportion of errors occur despite the target item being physically manipulated, highlighting issues with detailed inspection.