Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs02:26

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

11.6K
Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
11.6K
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs01:05

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs

14.6K
A single nucleotide polymorphism or SNP is a single nucleotide variation at a specific genomic position in a large population. It is the most prevalent type of sequence variation found in the human genome. Point mutations that occur in more than 1% of the population qualify as SNPs. These are present once every 1000 nucleotides on an average in the human genome. Replacement of a purine with another purine (A/G) or a pyrimidine with another pyrimidine (C/T) is known as a transition. In contrast,...
14.6K
Genome Copying Errors02:46

Genome Copying Errors

4.3K
DNA replication is a well-evolved process that copies millions of base pairs with high fidelity during each cell division. Occasionally a wrong base or a long stretch of wrong bases may get added to the daughter strands. If the errors are left unchecked, cells might accumulate several mutations that might endanger their  survival. Therefore, the copying errors are checked and repaired at three levels.
4.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Biocompatibility of silk fibroin nanofibers scaffold with olfactory ensheathing cells].

Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery·2009
Same author

[Association of tryptophan hydroxylase gene A218C and serotonin transporter gene polymorphism with essential hypertension in Chinese northern Han population].

Zhonghua xin xue guan bing za zhi·2009
Same author

An FES cycling control system based on CPG.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2009
Same author

One example on how colloidal nano- and microparticles could contribute to medicine.

Nanomedicine (London, England)·2009
Same author

[Mutational analysis of Meq, RLORF4, RLORF12 and 132bpr genes of epidemic Marek's disease virus strains highly passaged on chicken embryo fibroblast].

Bing du xue bao = Chinese journal of virology·2009
Same author

Dietary fish oil n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and alpha-linolenic acid differently affect brain accretion of docosahexaenoic acid and expression of desaturases and sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1 in mice.

The Journal of nutritional biochemistry·2009

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 2, 2026

Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform
09:30

Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform

Published on: August 17, 2022

2.1K

Evaluation of copy number variation detection for a SNP array platform.

Xin Zhang, Renqian Du, Shilin Li

  • 1State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and MOE Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, 220 Handan Road, Shanghai 200433, China. wanghy@fudan.edu.cn.

BMC Bioinformatics
|February 22, 2014
PubMed
Summary

This study evaluated four software packages for detecting Copy Number Variations (CNVs) from SNP arrays. PennCNV demonstrated superior sensitivity and specificity, suggesting combined algorithms may optimize CNV detection.

More Related Videos

Detection of Copy Number Alterations Using Single Cell Sequencing
09:45

Detection of Copy Number Alterations Using Single Cell Sequencing

Published on: February 17, 2017

12.6K
Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Array CGH for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants
09:16

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Array CGH for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants

Published on: February 21, 2015

19.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 2, 2026

Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform
09:30

Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform

Published on: August 17, 2022

2.1K
Detection of Copy Number Alterations Using Single Cell Sequencing
09:45

Detection of Copy Number Alterations Using Single Cell Sequencing

Published on: February 17, 2017

12.6K
Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Array CGH for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants
09:16

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Array CGH for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants

Published on: February 21, 2015

19.4K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Copy Number Variations (CNVs) are crucial genomic alterations.
  • Accurate inference of CNVs from Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) arrays relies on various software packages.
  • A clear understanding of the performance variations among these CNV detection tools is lacking, hindering optimal selection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare the performance of four publicly available software packages for CNV detection using Affymetrix SNP arrays.
  • To assess the sensitivity, specificity, consistency, and reproducibility of these tools against a gold standard Array-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) dataset.
  • To investigate the efficiency of using multiple algorithms for CNV calling.

Main Methods:

  • Four software packages (Birdsuite, dChip, Genotyping Console (GTC), PennCNV) were selected for CNV calling from Affymetrix SNP array data.
  • Performance metrics including success rate, stability, sensitivity, consistency, and reproducibility were assessed.
  • Results were compared against a high-resolution (24 million probes/sample) CGH dataset considered the gold standard.
  • The study also compared CNV detection efficiency using single versus multiple software packages.

Main Results:

  • Birdsuite detected the highest quantity of CNVs, while GTC detected the least.
  • Birdsuite and dChip exhibited detecting bias; GTC showed the lowest consistency but identified the most matching CNVs compared to CGH.
  • PennCNV-Affy demonstrated the best reproducibility and consistency in CNV calling, outperforming Birdsuite.
  • GTC had the highest consistency among the single software packages evaluated.

Conclusions:

  • PennCNV outperformed the other evaluated packages in sensitivity and specificity for CNV calling.
  • Each CNV calling method possesses unique advantages and limitations.
  • Employing multiple algorithms to assess concordance and discordance is recommended for optimizing SNP array-based CNV detection.