Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Conservative Safety Assessment of a Nitinol Microhook Coaptation Device on Intact Nerve.

Muscle & nerve·2026
Same author

Digital Nerve Repair With Flexor Tendon Injury: Conduits are Less Effective.

Hand (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Efficacy of Nerve Tape-Assisted PEG Fusion in a Rabbit Tibial Nerve Repair Model.

Journal of reconstructive microsurgery·2025
Same author

Isograft Obtained From ZDF (Obese Fa/Fa) Rats Does Not Impair Nerve Regeneration Compared to Healthy Isograft.

Muscle & nerve·2025
Same author

Nerve Tape Is an Effective Tool for Small Nerve Repair.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2025
Same author

Postoperative Complications After Operative Treatment of Open Versus Closed Distal Radius Fractures: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

Journal of hand surgery global online·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 2, 2026

Author Spotlight: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery in Postamputation Pain Management
03:53

Author Spotlight: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery in Postamputation Pain Management

Published on: March 15, 2024

3.5K

Surgeon perspectives on alternative nerve repair techniques.

Anthony Owusu1, Brian Mayeda1, Jonathan Isaacs2

  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center (VCUMC), 1250 East Marshall Street, Richmond, VA 23298 USA.

Hand (New York, N.Y.)
|February 27, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Microsuturing remains the gold standard for nerve repair, but most surgeons are open to alternative techniques. Lack of outcome data and unfamiliarity are key barriers to adopting new nerve repair methods.

Keywords:
Alternative nerve repair techniquesNerve repairSurgeon preference

More Related Videos

Implantation and Control of Wireless, Battery-free Systems for Peripheral Nerve Interfacing
07:13

Implantation and Control of Wireless, Battery-free Systems for Peripheral Nerve Interfacing

Published on: October 20, 2021

5.6K
Stromal Vascular Fraction-enriched Fat Grafting for the Treatment of Symptomatic End-neuromata
07:58

Stromal Vascular Fraction-enriched Fat Grafting for the Treatment of Symptomatic End-neuromata

Published on: November 23, 2017

7.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 2, 2026

Author Spotlight: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery in Postamputation Pain Management
03:53

Author Spotlight: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery in Postamputation Pain Management

Published on: March 15, 2024

3.5K
Implantation and Control of Wireless, Battery-free Systems for Peripheral Nerve Interfacing
07:13

Implantation and Control of Wireless, Battery-free Systems for Peripheral Nerve Interfacing

Published on: October 20, 2021

5.6K
Stromal Vascular Fraction-enriched Fat Grafting for the Treatment of Symptomatic End-neuromata
07:58

Stromal Vascular Fraction-enriched Fat Grafting for the Treatment of Symptomatic End-neuromata

Published on: November 23, 2017

7.2K

Area of Science:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Hand Surgery
  • Surgical Innovation

Background:

  • Microsuturing is the established gold standard for nerve repair.
  • Alternative nerve repair techniques show variable acceptance.
  • Limited data exists on surgeon attitudes toward novel nerve repair methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess surgeon attitudes and acceptance of alternative nerve repair techniques.
  • To identify barriers and facilitators for adopting new nerve repair methods.
  • To understand surgeon preferences regarding nerve repair modalities.

Main Methods:

  • An electronic questionnaire was distributed to members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand and the American Association of Hand Surgery.
  • Surveys collected demographic data, current technique usage, and attitudes toward new nerve repair methods.
  • Data analysis focused on general trends and demographic stratification.

Main Results:

  • Microsuturing is the preferred and most utilized nerve repair technique.
  • Over 90% of surgeons are open to using or currently use alternative nerve repair techniques.
  • Barriers include lack of outcome data and unfamiliarity; absorbable polymers are perceived as safe, unlike metal.

Conclusions:

  • While microsuturing is preferred, surgeons are receptive to alternative nerve repair techniques.
  • Adoption of new techniques is driven by improved outcomes, speed, and ease of use.
  • Findings can guide future research and funding for alternative nerve repair strategies.