Importance of hospital entry: walk-in STEMI and primary percutaneous coronary intervention
Eric Bansal1, Rahul Dhawan1, Brittany Wagman2
1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Insights
Walk-in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients experience longer door-to-balloon times than those arriving by emergency medical services (EMS). Hospital entry mode is the key predictor of these delays, highlighting the need for faster triage of walk-in STEMI cases.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Emergency Medicine
- Health Services Research
Background:
- ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) requires urgent reperfusion therapy.
- Walk-in STEMI patients often face longer treatment delays than those transported by emergency medical services (EMS).
- Factors contributing to these delays beyond emergency department triage efficiency require investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare demographic and clinical characteristics of walk-in versus EMS-transported STEMI patients.
- To identify factors associated with prolonged door-to-balloon (D2B) times in walk-in STEMI patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 136 STEMI patients (January 2009 - December 2010).
- Collected data included demographics, hospital entry mode, treatment times, and angiographic findings.
- Compared walk-in and EMS groups; used logistic regression to identify predictors of prolonged D2B time.
Main Results:
- Walk-in patients were more likely to be Latino, have higher heart rate/blood pressure, diabetes history, and elevated troponin.
- EMS patients had higher prevalence of left main coronary artery disease.
- Walk-in patients had significantly longer door-to-ECG, ECG-to-catheterization lab, and D2B times, with a higher likelihood of D2B >90 minutes (OR 3.53).
- Hospital entry mode was the sole independent predictor of prolonged D2B time.
Conclusions:
- Significant baseline differences exist between walk-in and EMS-transported STEMI patients.
- Hospital entry mode is the primary predictor of prolonged primary PCI treatment times.
- Modifiable factors like door-to-ECG and ECG-to-catheterization lab activation times contribute to delays in walk-in patients.
- Strategies promoting EMS use and improving walk-in STEMI patient triage are crucial.
Introduction:
Patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) require rapid identification and triage to initiate reperfusion therapy. Walk-in STEMI patients have longer treatment times compared to emergency medical service (EMS) transported patients. While effective triage of large numbers of critically ill patients in the emergency department is often cited as the reason for treatment delays, additional factors have not been explored. The purpose of this study was to evaluate baseline demographic and clinical differences between walk-in and EMS-transported STEMI patients and identify factors associated with prolonged door to balloon (D2B) time in walk-in STEMI patients.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective review of 136 STEMI patients presenting to an urban academic teaching center from January 2009 through December 2010. Baseline demographics, mode of hospital entry (walk-in versus EMS transport), treatment times, angiographic findings, procedures performed and in-hospital clinical events were collected. We compared walk-in and EMS-transported STEMI patients and identified independent factors of prolonged D2B time for walk-in patients using stepwise logistic regression analysis.
Results:
Walk-in patients (n=51) were more likely to be Latino and presented with a higher heart rate, higher systolic blood pressure, prior history of diabetes mellitus and were more likely to have an elevated initial troponin value, compared to EMS-transported patients. EMS-transported patients (n=64) were more likely to be white and had a higher prevalence of left main coronary artery disease, compared to walk-in patients. Door to electrocardiogram (ECG), ECG to catheterization laboratory (CL) activation and D2B times were significantly longer for walk-in patients. Walk-in patients were more likely to have D2B time >90 minutes, compared to EMS- transported patients; odds ratio 3.53 (95% CI 1.03, 12.07), p=0.04. Stepwise logistic regression identified hospital entry mode as the only independent predictor for prolonged D2B time.
Conclusion:
Baseline differences exist between walk-in and EMS-transported STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Hospital entry mode was the most important predictor for prolonged treatment times for primary PCI, independent of age, Latino ethnicity, heart rate, systolic blood pressure and initial troponin value. Prolonged door to ECG and ECG to CL activation times are modifiable factors associated with prolonged treatment times in walk-in STEMI patients. In addition to promoting the use of EMS transport, efforts are needed to rapidly identify and expedite the triage of walk-in STEMI patients.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview


