Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of six screening methods for detecting significant bacteriuria.

T K Smith1, A J Hudson, R C Spencer

  • 1Department of Bacteriology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield.

Journal of Clinical Pathology
|August 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary

Six screening methods for bacteriuria detection showed high accuracy for negative results but lower accuracy for positive results. Bioluminescence offered the best specificity, making it suitable for ruling out infections.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Potential Trypanocidal Activity of Glycerol Analogues.

ChemistryOpen·2024
Same author

Safeguard stewards of biodiversity knowledge-Response.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2024
Same author

The global distribution of plants used by humans.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2024
Same author

A novel lipase with dual localisation in Trypanosoma brucei.

Scientific reports·2022
Same author

Surface-enhanced Raman scattering measurement from a lipid bilayer encapsulating a single decahedral nanoparticle mediated by an optical trap.

Nanoscale·2016
Same author

Effects of a silica-based feed supplement on performance, health, and litter quality of growing turkeys.

Poultry science·2015

Area of Science:

  • Clinical microbiology
  • Diagnostic test evaluation
  • Urology

Background:

  • Significant bacteriuria requires accurate and efficient detection methods.
  • Current screening methods vary in their diagnostic performance.
  • Evaluating new and existing rapid diagnostic tools is crucial for clinical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of six different screening methods for significant bacteriuria.
  • To compare the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of each method.
  • To determine the most effective method for screening urinary tract infections.

Main Methods:

  • Electrical impedance (Malthus)
  • Automated acridine-orange staining (Autotrak)
  • Particle counting (Ramus)

Related Experiment Videos

  • Bioluminescence
  • Nitrite and leucocyte test strip (BM Nephur)
  • Microscopy

    • Main Results:

    • All methods demonstrated excellent negative predictive values (97%-100%).
    • Positive predictive values ranged from 31% to 83%, indicating lower accuracy for positive results.
    • Sensitivities were high (83%-100%), but specificities were moderate (68%-79%).
    • Bioluminescence exhibited the highest specificity (79%) and the lowest false positive rate (15%).

    Conclusions:

    • No single method was sufficiently accurate for definitive diagnosis based on positive results alone.
    • All evaluated methods are effective for screening out negative results (ruling out infection).
    • Bioluminescence is recommended for its superior specificity in identifying true negatives.