Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Assaying Predatory Feeding Behaviors in Pristionchus and Other Nematodes
Published on: September 4, 2016
Increased predation of nutrient-enriched aposematic prey
Christina G Halpin1, John Skelhorn, Candy Rowe
1Centre for Behaviour and Evolution, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK.
Birds learn to avoid toxic prey but may eat them for nutrition. European starlings increased intake of toxic prey when nutrition was boosted, showing birds use post-ingestive feedback for foraging decisions.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Ecology
- Predator-Prey Dynamics
- Chemical Ecology
Background:
- Avian predators associate warning coloration (aposematism) with prey toxicity.
- Predators may consume toxic prey, balancing nutrient gain against toxin ingestion costs.
- The role of prey nutritional content in predator decisions regarding toxic prey is understudied.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how nutritional content of toxic prey influences avian predator foraging decisions.
- To determine if birds use post-ingestive feedback to assess the nutritional value of toxic prey.
Main Methods:
- Experimental manipulation of the nutritional content of a toxic prey type.
- Observation of European starling (Sturnus vulgaris) feeding behavior in response to nutritional changes.
- Analysis of prey intake rates based on nutritional enrichment and cessation.
Main Results:
- European starlings significantly increased their intake of toxic prey when its nutritional content was artificially enhanced.
- Prey intake decreased when nutritional enrichment was removed, indicating adaptive foraging adjustments.
- Birds demonstrated the ability to detect and respond to nutritional content via post-ingestive feedback.
Conclusions:
- Avian predators actively assess and utilize the nutritional value of toxic prey.
- Nutritional variability in toxic prey can lead to differential predation, impacting prey defense evolution.
- Findings offer new insights into the evolutionary dynamics of aposematism and mimicry systems.
More Related Videos
10:20Linking Predation Risk, Herbivore Physiological Stress and Microbial Decomposition of Plant Litter
Published on: March 12, 2013
16:03A Fish-feeding Laboratory Bioassay to Assess the Antipredatory Activity of Secondary Metabolites from the Tissues of Marine Organisms
Published on: January 11, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Predator-Prey Interactions
Frequency-dependent Selection
Microbial Interactions: Predation
Optimal Foraging
Diversity of Protists II
Types of Selection