Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

A Mouse Distraction Osteogenesis Model
Published on: November 14, 2018
Skeletal and soft tissue response to automated, continuous, curvilinear distraction osteogenesis
Zachary S Peacock1, Brad J Tricomi2, Matthew E Lawler3
1Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Purpose:
To document the bone formation and soft tissue changes in response to automated, continuous, curvilinear distraction osteogenesis (DO) at rates greater than 1 mm/day in a minipig model.
Materials And Methods:
Two groups of Yucatan minipigs underwent automated, continuous, curvilinear DO of the right mandible: group A, 1.5 mm/day (n = 5); and group B, 3.0 mm/day (n = 5). Each minipig underwent 12 mm of distraction followed by 24 days of fixation. The distracted and contralateral mandibles were harvested at the end of fixation. The percentage of surface area (PSA) of the regenerate occupied by bone, fibrous tissue, cartilage, and hematoma was determined using computerized histomorphometric analysis. The control groups consisted of DO wounds distracted discontinuously at 1 mm/day and the nonoperated contralateral mandible. The ipsilateral and contralateral digastric muscles were harvested and stained for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), myogenic differentiation-1 (MyoD), and paired Box 7 protein (PAX7).
Results:
All 10 minipigs completed the distraction and fixation period. The PSA occupied by bone was similar for groups A (PSA 64.36% ± 5.87%) and B (PSA 63.83% ± 3.37%) and the control group (1 mm/day; PSA 64.89% ± 0.56%) but was less than that on the nonoperated side (PSA 84.67% ± 0.86%). The PSA occupied by cartilage and hematoma in all groups was minimal (<1.1%). The digastric muscles had no abnormal tissue or inflammation, and PAX7, MyoD, and PCNA expression had returned to the baseline levels.
Conclusions:
The results of the present study indicate that bone formation in response to automated, continuous, and curvilinear DO at a rate of 1.5 and 3.0 mm/day is nearly identical to that with discontinuous DO at 1 mm/day. In addition, no deleterious effects were found on the digastric muscles.
More Related Videos
09:26An Efficient and Reproducible Protocol for Distraction Osteogenesis in a Rat Model Leading to a Functional Regenerated Femur
Published on: October 23, 2017
07:35Creating Rigidly Stabilized Fractures for Assessing Intramembranous Ossification, Distraction Osteogenesis, or Healing of Critical Sized Defects
Published on: April 11, 2012