Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

McNemar's Test01:23

McNemar's Test

1.0K
McNemar's Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there is a significant difference in proportions between two related groups when the outcome is binary (e.g., yes/no, success/failure). It is beneficial when we have paired data, such as pre-test/post-test designs, where the same subjects are measured under two different conditions. The test is named after the statistician Quinn McNemar, who introduced it in 1947. It is commonly used in situations where subjects are...
1.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neutrophil-Like Mitochondria Enable Blood-Brain Barrier Transmigration and Neuroprotection.

ACS nano·2026
Same author

Metabolism-modulating nanoparticles for remodeling adipose-liver crosstalk to reverse liver fibrosis.

Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society·2026
Same author

Recombinant AcHERV-baculovirus vaccine elicits robust immune responses against human norovirus.

Vaccine·2026
Same author

Intestinal microenvironment-modulating nanomedicines for inflammatory bowel disease.

Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society·2026
Same author

Integrative Assessment of <i>Glycyrrhiza uralensis</i> Extract in Cosmetics Using HPLC Analysis, Network Pharmacology, and Computational Threshold of Toxicological Concern-Based Safety Evaluation.

International journal of molecular sciences·2025
Same author

Current Perspectives and Future Directions in the Immunogenicity Landscape of Norovirus Vaccines.

Journal of microbiology and biotechnology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 2, 2026

Vertical T-maze Choice Assay for Arthropod Response to Odorants
06:13

Vertical T-maze Choice Assay for Arthropod Response to Odorants

Published on: February 14, 2013

14.9K

Development and evaluation of a semifield test for repellent efficacy testing.

Jong Kwang Yoon1, Kang-Chang Kim1, Yeon Dong Cho1

  • 1Department of Bio-industrial Technologies, Konkuk University, Seoul 143-701, South Korea.

Journal of Medical Entomology
|March 11, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Evaluating mosquito repellent effectiveness requires lab and field tests. Semifield tests offer a practical alternative to field studies, ensuring volunteer safety while providing meaningful efficacy data for N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide.

More Related Videos

Video Tracking Protocol to Screen Deterrent Chemistries for Honey Bees
10:19

Video Tracking Protocol to Screen Deterrent Chemistries for Honey Bees

Published on: June 12, 2017

6.2K
Electroantennographic Bioassay as a Screening Tool for Host Plant Volatiles
12:43

Electroantennographic Bioassay as a Screening Tool for Host Plant Volatiles

Published on: May 6, 2012

13.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 2, 2026

Vertical T-maze Choice Assay for Arthropod Response to Odorants
06:13

Vertical T-maze Choice Assay for Arthropod Response to Odorants

Published on: February 14, 2013

14.9K
Video Tracking Protocol to Screen Deterrent Chemistries for Honey Bees
10:19

Video Tracking Protocol to Screen Deterrent Chemistries for Honey Bees

Published on: June 12, 2017

6.2K
Electroantennographic Bioassay as a Screening Tool for Host Plant Volatiles
12:43

Electroantennographic Bioassay as a Screening Tool for Host Plant Volatiles

Published on: May 6, 2012

13.3K

Area of Science:

  • Entomology
  • Public Health
  • Toxicology

Background:

  • Assessing mosquito repellent efficacy is crucial for public health.
  • Field tests provide meaningful data but pose safety concerns for human volunteers.
  • Laboratory tests offer safety but may not fully represent real-world conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of mosquito repellents under laboratory, semifield, and field conditions.
  • To evaluate N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET) using different testing methodologies.
  • To determine if semifield tests can serve as a viable alternative to traditional field tests.

Main Methods:

  • Efficacy of N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide was assessed using human volunteers in laboratory settings.
  • Mosquito repellent effectiveness was evaluated in semifield (outdoor enclosure) and field conditions.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) traps and experimental mice were utilized in semifield and field tests.

Main Results:

  • Semifield tests demonstrated comparable results to field tests in assessing repellent efficacy.
  • N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide showed effectiveness across all tested conditions.
  • The study identified semifield testing as a promising method for evaluating mosquito repellents.

Conclusions:

  • Semifield testing presents a suitable replacement for field tests in evaluating mosquito repellent efficacy.
  • Consideration of semifield tests is recommended for developing new testing guidelines.
  • This approach balances meaningful efficacy assessment with improved volunteer safety.