Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Noninvasive temporary pacemakers.

B A Gould1, A J Marshall

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Greenbank Hospital, Plymouth, Devon, UK.

Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology : PACE
|September 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Gefitinib targets ZAP-70-expressing chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells and inhibits B-cell receptor signaling.

Cell death & disease·2014
Same author

Follicular dendritic cell secreted protein FDC-SP controls IgA production.

Mucosal immunology·2014
Same author

Haemoglobin levels in blood donors.

Glasgow medical journal·2010
Same author

Atenolol-Once-daily Dosage.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine·2010
Same author

Epidermal and dermal integration into sphere-templated porous poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) implants in mice.

Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A·2010
Same author

Evaluating orangutan census techniques using nest decay rates: implications for population estimates.

Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America·2008
Same journal

A Case of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation via the Epicardial Approach Using the 3830 Lead in an 11-Day-Old Neonate (With Follow-Up of the Above Case).

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

Tilt Test Duration in Suspected Vasovagal Syncope: Temporal Patterns and Diagnostic Yield in Patients From Central China.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

Combined Leadless Pacing and Subcutaneous ICD Therapy in Long QT Syndromes.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

Association of Anesthesia Modality With Procedural Parameters and Clinical Outcomes in PVI for Atrial Fibrillation.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

Zero-Fluoroscopy Cryoballoon Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in a Patient With Dextrocardia: A Case Report.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
See all related articles

Temporary transcutaneous pacing, a method to regulate heart rhythm, showed limited success in trials. Pain often restricted the electrical current, suggesting improved pain management could enhance its emergency use.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Devices
  • Emergency Medicine

Background:

  • Temporary transcutaneous pacing delivers electrical current across the chest wall, synchronized to cardiac electrical signals.
  • This pacing method is used in both routine and emergency clinical scenarios.
  • Two systems, Cardio-Aid and Pace-Aid, were evaluated for their efficacy and limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of Cardio-Aid and Pace-Aid transcutaneous pacing systems.
  • To assess the performance of these systems in both routine and emergency settings.
  • To identify factors limiting the success of transcutaneous pacing.

Main Methods:

  • Two transcutaneous pacing systems, Cardio-Aid and Pace-Aid, were tested on a total of 30 patients.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Patients included those undergoing routine procedures and emergency interventions.
  • Success rates and the impact of patient-reported pain on current output were recorded.

    • Main Results:

    • Successful pacing was achieved in 3 of 19 patients using Cardio-Aid and 4 of 11 patients using Pace-Aid.
    • Emergency use showed higher success rates for Pace-Aid (3 of 4 patients).
    • Patient-experienced pain was the primary limitation for maximum current delivery.

    Conclusions:

    • The overall benefit of temporary transcutaneous pacing appears limited.
    • Pain management with analgesics and sedation could potentially increase pacemaker output.
    • Optimizing pain control may improve the utility of transcutaneous pacing, especially in emergencies.