Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

A Novel Approach for the Administration of Medications and Fluids in Emergency Scenarios and Settings
Published on: November 9, 2016
Peripheral i.v. stabilization and the rate of complications in children: an exploratory study
Nikki Laudenbach1, Carie A Braun2, Leigh Klaverkamp1
1St. Cloud Hospital, St. Cloud, MN.
Insights
For hospitalized children, standard tape and adhesive anchoring devices showed similar complication rates for peripheral intravascular catheters (PIVs). Stabilization devices may not be necessary for short-term PIV use in pediatric patients.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nursing
- Medical Device Technology
- Infection Control
Background:
- Peripheral intravascular catheter (PIV) insertion is a common invasive procedure in hospitalized children.
- PIV insertion carries a significant risk of complications, impacting patient care and outcomes.
- Current practices involve standard aseptic taping, with newer adhesive anchoring devices available.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare complication rates between standard aseptic taping and an adhesive anchoring device for pediatric PIVs.
- To evaluate the efficacy of stabilization devices in reducing PIV-related complications in children.
- To provide evidence-based recommendations for PIV securement in pediatric populations.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 80 hospitalized children aged 2-17 years.
- Two groups were assessed: one using standard aseptic taping, the other using a commercial adhesive anchoring device.
- Complication rates, including occlusion, infiltration, leaking, and dislodgement, were recorded and compared.
Main Results:
- Overall complication rate was 22.5% (18 out of 80 participants).
- The most frequent complications were occlusion (n=8), infiltration (n=4), leaking (n=3), and dislodgement (n=2).
- No statistically significant difference in complication rates or types was observed between the taping and anchoring device groups.
Conclusions:
- The study suggests that adhesive anchoring devices may not offer a significant advantage over standard aseptic taping for short-duration PIVs in children.
- Complication rates are comparable between the two methods, indicating potential for cost-effectiveness with standard taping.
- Further research could explore long-term PIV use and specific pediatric subpopulations.
Abstract:
Peripheral intravascular catheter insertion is the most common invasive procedure performed on the hospitalized child with a significant potential for complications. This study compared complication rates between a standard aseptic taping technique and a commercially-available adhesive anchoring device in 80 hospitalized children ages 2-17 years. Eighteen (18) participants (22.5%) experienced a complication with occlusion being the most common (n=8) followed by infiltration (n=4), leaking (n=3), and dislodgement (n=2). There were no differences in complication rates or types between the two groups. This study provides evidence that a stabilization device may not be necessary in short-duration PIVs in children.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
Peritoneal Dialysis II: Peritoneal Dialysis Systems and Complications
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children

