Mucositis not neutropenia determines bacteremia among hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

A H E Herbers1, A F J de Haan, W J F M van der Velden

  • 1Department of Hematology, Nijmegen Institute for Infection, Inflammation and Immunity (N4i), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Abstract

Insights

Severe intestinal mucositis, indicated by low plasma citrulline levels, is a better predictor of bacteremia risk after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) than neutropenia. Measuring citrulline can guide antimicrobial therapy decisions.

Area of Science:

  • Hematology
  • Transplant Immunology
  • Infectious Disease

Background:

  • Infectious complications historically dominated fevers post-hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).
  • Intestinal mucositis is now recognized as a key factor influencing inflammatory responses and infection risk following HSCT.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of intestinal mucositis and neutropenia on systemic inflammation and bacteremia.
  • To compare outcomes between myeloablative (MA) and non-myeloablative (NMA) HSCT regimens regarding mucositis and bacteremia.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective study of 2 HSCT cohorts (MA: n=18, NMA: n=19).
  • Intestinal mucositis assessed via plasma citrulline levels.
  • Systemic inflammation measured by C-reactive protein; bacteremia monitored through blood cultures.

Main Results:

  • Myeloablative (MA) regimen induced severe mucositis (citrulline <10 μmol/L), leading to bacteremia in 44% of patients.
  • Non-myeloablative (NMA) regimen resulted in less severe mucositis, with bacteremia in only 11% of patients.
  • Both groups experienced neutropenia, but it was prolonged in the NMA group.

Conclusions:

  • Severe intestinal mucositis (citrulline <10 μmol/L) is a more precise indicator of bacteremia risk than neutropenia post-HSCT.
  • Plasma citrulline levels may aid in determining the need and timing for empirical antimicrobial therapy in HSCT patients.