Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Temporal trends in refractive error among children and adolescents in Germany - a large-scale analysis of spectacle sales data from dispensing opticians from 2001 to 2025.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same author

Correction of aphakia using biometry-based contact lens calculation in pediatric cataract extraction: introducing the aphakic contact lens formula.

Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie·2026
Same author

Feasibility of lung imaging at 0.55T for assessment of interstitial lung disease in patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis.

European radiology·2026
Same author

AI-Based Opportunistic CT Risk Assessment Using TotalSegmentator in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026
Same author

Assessing Visual Function in Retinal Gene Therapy.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same author

AI-Based Myocardial Segmentation and Attenuation Mapping Improved Detection of Myocardial Ischemia and Infarction on Emergency CT Angiography.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 2, 2026

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

7.7K

Visual evoked potential-based acuity assessment: overestimation in amblyopia.

Yaroslava Wenner1, Sven P Heinrich, Christina Beisse

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Phillips-University Marburg, Universitätsklinikum Giessen & Marburg GmbH, Marburg, Germany.

Documenta Ophthalmologica. Advances in Ophthalmology
|March 14, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Visual evoked potential (VEP) testing can overestimate visual acuity (VA) in amblyopic eyes, especially when using checkerboard patterns. This objective measure, while reproducible, requires cautious interpretation in amblyopia to avoid inflated acuity results.

More Related Videos

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games
06:25

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games

Published on: January 14, 2020

15.0K
Comparison of Three Clinical Stereoscopic Methods for Measuring Binocular Visual Function During Amblyopic Treatment in Unilateral Amblyopia
06:19

Comparison of Three Clinical Stereoscopic Methods for Measuring Binocular Visual Function During Amblyopic Treatment in Unilateral Amblyopia

Published on: September 27, 2024

691

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 2, 2026

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

7.7K
Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games
06:25

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games

Published on: January 14, 2020

15.0K
Comparison of Three Clinical Stereoscopic Methods for Measuring Binocular Visual Function During Amblyopic Treatment in Unilateral Amblyopia
06:19

Comparison of Three Clinical Stereoscopic Methods for Measuring Binocular Visual Function During Amblyopic Treatment in Unilateral Amblyopia

Published on: September 27, 2024

691

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Science

Background:

  • Visual acuity (VA) assessment in amblyopia using repetitive stimuli can lead to overestimation.
  • The extent to which this overestimation applies to VEP-based objective acuity assessment is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the overestimation of visual acuity (VA) in amblyopia using VEP-based objective assessment.
  • To compare VEP-based acuity with psychophysical measures in amblyopic eyes.

Main Methods:

  • Seventeen subjects with amblyopia underwent VEP-based acuity assessment using the Freiburg Acuity VEP (FrAVEP) method with checkerboard stimuli.
  • Psychophysical VA was measured using the Freiburg Visual Acuity Test (FrACT).
  • VEP data were analyzed using Fourier analysis to determine amplitude and significance at the stimulus frequency.

Main Results:

  • VEP-based (FrAVEP) and psychophysical (FrACT) visual acuity measurements showed high test-retest reproducibility (±0.20 logMAR).
  • In 53% of amblyopic eyes, FrAVEP overestimated single Landolt-C acuity by over 0.3 logMAR, up to 1 logMAR.
  • The VEP method showed significantly smaller acuity differences between dominant and amblyopic eyes compared to psychophysical testing.

Conclusions:

  • VEP-based and psychophysical visual acuity measurements are highly reproducible in amblyopia.
  • VEP-based acuity assessment, particularly with checkerboard stimuli, can markedly overestimate visual acuity in amblyopia.
  • Objective VEP assessment should be interpreted with caution in amblyopia due to potential overestimation.