Does osteoderm growth follow energy minimization principles?
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Culture of Murine Embryonic Metatarsals: A Physiological Model of Endochondral Ossification
Published on: December 3, 2016
Sebastián Sensale1, Washington Jones, R Ernesto Blanco
1Núcleo de Biomecánica, Espacio Interdiscipinario, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, 11200, Uruguay; Instituto de Física, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, 11300, Uruguay.
Abstract:
Although the growth and development of tissues and organs of extinct species cannot be directly observed, their fossils can record and preserve evidence of these mechanisms. It is generally accepted that bone architecture is the result of genetically based biomechanical constraints, but what about osteoderms? In this article, the influence of physical constraints on cranial osteoderms growth is assessed. Comparisons among lepidosaurs, synapsids, and archosaurs are performed; according to these analyses, lepidosaur osteoderms growth is predicted to be less energy demanding than that of synapsids and archosaurs. Obtained results also show that, from an energetic viewpoint, ankylosaurid osteoderms growth resembles more that of mammals than the one of reptilians, adding evidence to debate whether dinosaurs were hot or cold blooded.
Related Concept Videos
Energy Budgets
Bone Remodeling
Growth of Cartilage and Bone Tissue
Energy Diagrams - II
The point in the energy diagram at which the system’s potential energy is the lowest is known as the local minima. The system tends to stay in this position indefinitely unless acted upon by a net force. The slope of the potential energy diagram at the local minima is zero, indicating that zero net force is acting on the system. The...
Oxygen Requirements and Growth Patterns
Osteoclasts in Bone Remodeling

