Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

A Recovery Cardiopulmonary Bypass Model Without Transfusion or Inotropic Agents in Rats
Published on: March 23, 2018
Manual vs. integrated automatic load-distributing band CPR with equal survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest.
Lars Wik1, Jan-Aage Olsen2, David Persse3
1Norwegian Center for Prehospital Emergency Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Insights
Integrated automated load distributing band CPR (iA-CPR) demonstrated statistically equivalent survival to hospital discharge compared to high-quality manual CPR (M-CPR). This finding supports iA-CPR as a viable alternative in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest scenarios.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Cardiovascular Research
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a leading cause of death.
- High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is critical for patient survival.
- Automated CPR devices are being developed to improve resuscitation quality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of integrated automated load distributing band CPR (iA-CPR) against high-quality manual CPR (M-CPR).
- To determine if iA-CPR is equivalent, superior, or inferior to M-CPR in terms of survival to hospital discharge.
Main Methods:
- A randomized, unblinded, controlled group sequential trial was conducted across multiple international sites.
- Adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac origin were randomized to receive either iA-CPR or M-CPR after initial manual compressions.
- The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge, with CPR quality monitored electronically.
Main Results:
- The study included 4131 patients (2099 iA-CPR, 2132 M-CPR) after exclusions.
- Survival to hospital discharge rates were 9.4% for iA-CPR and 11.0% for M-CPR.
- The adjusted odds ratio for survival to hospital discharge was 1.06 (95% CI 0.83-1.37), indicating equivalence between iA-CPR and M-CPR.
Conclusions:
- Integrated automated load distributing band CPR (iA-CPR) provides statistically equivalent survival to hospital discharge compared to high-quality manual CPR.
- iA-CPR can be considered a comparable alternative to M-CPR for improving outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Objective:
To compare integrated automated load distributing band CPR (iA-CPR) with high-quality manual CPR (M-CPR) to determine equivalence, superiority, or inferiority in survival to hospital discharge.
Methods:
Between March 5, 2009 and January 11, 2011 a randomized, unblinded, controlled group sequential trial of adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrests of presumed cardiac origin was conducted at three US and two European sites. After EMS providers initiated manual compressions patients were randomized to receive either iA-CPR or M-CPR. Patient follow-up was until all patients were discharged alive or died. The primary outcome, survival to hospital discharge, was analyzed adjusting for covariates, (age, witnessed arrest, initial cardiac rhythm, enrollment site) and interim analyses. CPR quality and protocol adherence were monitored (CPR fraction) electronically throughout the trial.
Results:
Of 4753 randomized patients, 522 (11.0%) met post enrollment exclusion criteria. Therefore, 2099 (49.6%) received iA-CPR and 2132 (50.4%) M-CPR. Sustained ROSC (emergency department admittance), 24h survival and hospital discharge (unknown for 12 cases) for iA-CPR compared to M-CPR were 600 (28.6%) vs. 689 (32.3%), 456 (21.8%) vs. 532 (25.0%), 196 (9.4%) vs. 233 (11.0%) patients, respectively. The adjusted odds ratio of survival to hospital discharge for iA-CPR compared to M-CPR, was 1.06 (95% CI 0.83-1.37), meeting the criteria for equivalence. The 20 min CPR fraction was 80.4% for iA-CPR and 80.2% for M-CPR.
Conclusion:
Compared to high-quality M-CPR, iA-CPR resulted in statistically equivalent survival to hospital discharge.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management

