Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Prevalence of visual-functional mismatch regarding coronary artery stenosis in the CVIT-DEFER registry
Masato Nakamura1, Masakazu Yamagishi, Takafumi Ueno
1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Ohashi Medical Center, Toho University School of Medicine, 2-17-6 Ohashi, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-8515, Japan, masato@oha.toho-u.ac.jp.
Insights
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment frequently mismatches coronary angiography in moderate stenosis. This highlights the need for physiological evaluation alongside visual assessment to guide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) decisions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a reliable index for assessing coronary artery stenosis severity.
- Discrepancies exist between coronary angiography and FFR in evaluating stenosis severity.
- Moderate coronary lesions often present challenges in accurate assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze demographic and angiographic predictors of FFR results in moderate coronary stenosis.
- To assess the incidence of angiographic-FFR mismatch in a large patient cohort.
- To determine factors influencing discrepancies between visual stenosis assessment and FFR values.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, multicenter registry study (CVIT-DEFER) of 3,228 patients with moderate coronary artery lesions.
- Analysis of demographic and angiographic parameters associated with FFR ≤0.8.
- Assessment of angiographic-FFR mismatch (visual stenosis ≥75% with FFR >0.80) and reverse mismatch (visual stenosis <75% with FFR ≤0.8).
Main Results:
- Angiographic-FFR mismatch occurred in 43.4% of lesions, while reverse mismatch was found in 23.2%.
- Predictors for mismatch included prior PCI, one-vessel disease, non-LAD location, non-diffuse, non-ostial, and non-tandem lesions.
- Reverse mismatch was associated with multivessel disease, LAD location, and diffuse lesions.
Conclusions:
- Angiographic-FFR mismatch is common in moderate coronary stenosis.
- FFR is influenced by stenosis severity, coronary morphology, and jeopardized myocardium.
- Physiological assessment using FFR is crucial for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) decisions in these patients.
Abstract:
The fractional flow reserve (FFR) is considered to be a reliable index for the assessment of clinically relevant coronary artery stenosis. However, mismatch in assessing the severity of coronary stenosis between coronary angiography and the FFR has been pointed out. The cardiovascular intervention therapeutics (CVIT)-DEFER registry is a prospective multicenter registry study that has enrolled 3,228 consecutive patients among 3,804 patients with angiographically moderate coronary artery lesions in whom FFR analysis was clinically indicated. The demographic and angiographic parameters associated with an FFR ≤0.8 were analyzed, and the incidence of discrepancy between the angiographic severity of coronary stenosis and the FFR was assessed. Based on the visual assessment, 1,609 (42.9%) lesions were categorized as showing 50% stenosis, 1,882 lesions (50.2%) as 75% stenosis, and 257 lesions (6.9%) as 90% stenosis. Angiographic-FFR "mismatch," which was defined as visual stenosis ≥75% with FFR >0.80, was found in 43.4% of lesions, while reverse angiographic mismatch (visual stenosis <75% with FFR ≤0.8) was found in 23.2%. The independent predictors for "angiographic-FFR mismatch" were the presence of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) history, one-vessel disease, non-left anterior descending artery (LAD) location, non-diffuse lesion, non-ostial lesion, and non-tandem lesion. Conversely, "reverse angiographic mismatch" was independently associated with the multivessel disease, LAD location, and diffuse lesion. The FFR is not only influenced by luminal stenosis but also by coronary artery morphology and the amount of jeopardized myocardium. Angiographic-FFR mismatch is frequent in patients with moderate coronary stenosis, which suggests the clinical importance of using physiological assessment to guide PCI.
More Related Videos
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
08:35Oxygenation-sensitive Cardiac MRI with Vasoactive Breathing Maneuvers for the Non-invasive Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction
Published on: August 17, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT