Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conservation of Small Populations02:04

Conservation of Small Populations

14.4K
Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less...
14.4K
Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

17.2K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
17.2K
Speciation Rates01:07

Speciation Rates

18.8K
Overview
18.8K
Mate Choice01:20

Mate Choice

8.3K
Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.
8.3K
Limits to Natural Selection01:38

Limits to Natural Selection

30.0K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
30.0K
Types of Selection01:46

Types of Selection

37.5K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
37.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Going With the Flow? Relative Importance of Riverine Hydrologic Connectivity Versus Tidal Influence for Spatial Structure of Genetic Diversity and Relatedness in a Foundational Submersed Aquatic Plant.

Ecology and evolution·2025
Same author

A mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) adult development rate model confirms evolved geographic differences.

Journal of insect science (Online)·2024
Same author

Grazing herbivores reduce herbaceous biomass and fire activity across African savannas.

Ecology letters·2024
Same author

Dust storms increase the tolerance of phytoplankton to thermal and pH changes.

Global change biology·2024
Same author

Calm after the storm? Similar patterns of genetic variation in a riverine foundation species before and after severe disturbance.

Ecology and evolution·2023
Same author

Integrating defense and leaf economic spectrum traits in a tropical savanna plant.

Frontiers in plant science·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 1, 2026

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
07:41

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

7.1K

Body size mediated coexistence in swans.

Katharina A M Engelhardt1, Mark E Ritchie2, James A Powell3

  • 1Appalachian Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Frostburg, MD 21532-2307, USA.

Thescientificworldjournal
|March 28, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Body size differences allow ecologically similar species, like tundra and trumpeter swans, to coexist by creating trade-offs between foraging efficiency and resource access. This balance is crucial for managing shared resources.

More Related Videos

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila
06:00

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila

Published on: October 1, 2011

16.1K
Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates
08:56

Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates

Published on: January 13, 2023

2.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 1, 2026

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
07:41

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

7.1K
Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila
06:00

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila

Published on: October 1, 2011

16.1K
Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates
08:56

Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates

Published on: January 13, 2023

2.5K

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Animal Behavior
  • Conservation Biology

Background:

  • Body size variation can influence interspecific competition and resource partitioning.
  • Ecologically similar species may coexist through niche differentiation, such as differential foraging strategies.
  • Understanding these dynamics is vital for effective wildlife management, especially for protected species.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of body size differences in mediating coexistence between tundra swans (Cygnus columbianus) and trumpeter swans (Cygnus buccinator).
  • To test the hypothesis that a trade-off exists between foraging efficiency and access to resources, facilitating coexistence on shared food sources.
  • To examine how foraging strategies and competitive interactions differ between these two swan species.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of foraging efficiency in tundra and trumpeter swans.
  • Assessment of resource access based on morphological traits (neck length) and behavioral traits (aggression).
  • Observation of swan feeding behavior on sago pondweed (Stuckenia pectinata) tubers in northern Utah.

Main Results:

  • Tundra swans exhibited higher foraging efficiency due to lower costs relative to gains.
  • Trumpeter swans, with longer necks, accessed deeper, exclusive resources.
  • Trumpeter swans demonstrated greater aggression, displacing tundra swans from preferred foraging sites.

Conclusions:

  • Body size differentiation is a key factor enabling coexistence among ecologically similar species competing for a single resource.
  • Conservation managers must consider the foraging efficiency versus resource access trade-off when managing shared resources for multiple species.
  • Effective management strategies are needed to ensure the coexistence of species, particularly when resources are limited and competition is intense.