Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

06:14
A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons Columba Livia
Published on: September 7, 2018
6.0K
Less means more for pigeons but not always
Thomas R Zentall1, Jennifer R Laude, Jacob P Case
1University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA, zentall@uky.edu.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|April 2, 2014
Summary
Pigeons normally choose optimally between food options, unlike humans, monkeys, and dogs who exhibit the "less-is-more" effect. However, hungry pigeons on a less-restricted diet showed this suboptimal choice behavior.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Economics
- Animal Cognition
- Decision-Making
Background:
- Humans often exhibit the "less-is-more" effect, devaluing a set of high-quality items when combined with lower-quality items.
- This suboptimal decision-making has also been observed in other species like monkeys and dogs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether pigeons exhibit the "less-is-more" effect in food choice tasks.
- To explore the influence of hunger levels on this decision-making behavior in pigeons.
Main Methods:
- Pigeons were presented with choices between single food options and combined food options.
- Experiment 2 manipulated the pigeons' food restriction levels to assess its impact on choice behavior.
Main Results:
- Normally hungry pigeons chose optimally, preferring a combination of preferred and less-preferred food over a single preferred food.
- Pigeons on a less-restricted diet demonstrated the suboptimal "less-is-more" effect, devaluing the combined food option.
- Control trials ruled out item novelty as the cause of the suboptimal choices.
Conclusions:
- Pigeon's food choice behavior can be optimal or suboptimal depending on their hunger level.
- The "less-is-more" effect in pigeons may stem from the devaluation of combined options when less-restricted, potentially due to increased motivation altering perceived value differences.
Related Concept Videos
Optimal Foraging
11.8K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
11.8K
Mate Choice
8.3K
Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.
8.3K
Limits to Natural Selection
30.0K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
30.0K
Types of Selection
37.5K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
37.5K
Migration
8.1K
Migration is long-range, seasonal movement from one region or habitat to another. This common strategy, carried out by many different organisms around the world, is an adaptive response that typically corresponds to changes in an organism’s environment, like resource availability or climate. Migrations can involve huge groups of thousands of animals as well as single individuals traveling alone and can range from thousands of kilometers to just a few hundred meters.
8.1K
Frequency-dependent Selection
20.1K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
20.1K

