Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025
The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer staging: a single-institution experience
Background:
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a wide reported variation in sensitivity and specificity for staging prostate cancer (PCA).
Aims:
We examined the accuracy of MRI in detecting PCA, and in identifying extracapsular extension (ECE) and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) in PCA patients at our institution.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed pre-biopsy MRI findings and correlated the same with subsequent radical prostatectomy pathology reports in all patients undergoing radical prostatectomy between 2010 and 2012. Specifically, comparison was made between MRI and pathologic stage. Age, serum prostate-specific antigen level and Gleason score were recorded.
Results:
MRI detected signal abnormalities in 50 out of 88 PCA patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Of these, 12 had ECE and 7 had SVI on final histology. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI for detecting ECE were 75 and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI for detecting SVI were 16.7 and 100%, respectively. The positive predictive values for determining ECE and SVI were 100% and negative predictive values were 96.2 and 90.6%, respectively.
Conclusions:
MRI may be reliable for excluding ECE and SVI in PCA patients where the lesion is visible on MRI. It has a good diagnostic ability for ECE, but is less accurate for identifying SVI. This article supports the use of MRI in the preoperative evaluation of PCA.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

