Related Experiment Videos
Comparison of the performance of clinical classification systems for myasthenia gravis relapse after thymoma
Zhiheng Yao1,2, Hongmu Li1,2, Zhenyuan Yang1,2
1Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Objective:
To characterize clinically significant myasthenia gravis (MG) relapse/exacerbation after thymoma resection and compare classification systems for risk stratification.
Methods:
This multicenter retrospective cohort included 257 patients with thymoma-associated MG who underwent extended thymectomy at 3 centers from July 2009 through November 2025. The end point was new MG symptoms after postoperative complete stable remission, pharmacologic remission, or minimal manifestation status plus verifiable MG-related treatment escalation or rescue therapy. Death without MG relapse/exacerbation was treated as a competing event. Cumulative incidence functions were estimated with Aalen-Johansen and compared with Gray tests; predictors were assessed with Fine-Gray models.
Results:
During median follow-up of 41.6 months, 69 relapse/exacerbation events and 21 competing deaths occurred. Cumulative incidence was 20.4% at 3 years and 29.0% at 5 years; 68% and 90% of events occurred within 3 and 5 years, respectively. Among 52 relapse/exacerbation events in patients who underwent surgery in 2018 or later with retrievable treatment-status data, 28 (53.8%) occurred during ongoing immunosuppression and 24 (46.2%) after withdrawal. The a/b phenotype-based grouping of the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America classification (1/A/B) showed the strongest separation (3-year cumulative incidences, 2.5%, 12.3%, and 56.4%; 5-year cumulative incidences, 7.6%, 29.6%, and 56.4% for groups 1, A, and B). Groups A and B were independently associated with relapse/exacerbation (subdistribution hazard ratio, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.18-5.91; and 10.55; 95% CI, 4.55-24.47).
Conclusions:
Clinically significant MG relapse/exacerbation after thymoma resection clustered in the early postoperative years. The a/b phenotype-based grouping of the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America classification (1/A/B) provided the most informative risk stratification.
Related Concept Videos
Myasthenia Gravis: Diagnostic Tests
The edrophonium test is a diagnostic tool for myasthenia gravis. It involves...
Myasthenia Gravis ll: Pathophysiology
Myasthenia Gravis: Overview and Treatment
These antibodies interfere with the function of the nicotinic receptors in three ways: by binding to the receptor and disrupting acetylcholine binding; by causing cross-linking of receptors which leads...