Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Disclosing Adverse Events to Patients: International Norms and Trends
Albert W Wu1, Layla McCay, Wendy Levinson
1From the *Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; †Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN), Washington, DC; ‡University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; §University of Technology, Sydney, Australia; ∥Canadian Medical Protective Association (CMPA), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; ¶University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado; #University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; **University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; ††University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; ‡‡Health Quality & Safety Commission, Wellington, New Zealand; §§Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI), Boston, Massachusetts; and ∥∥University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Objectives:
There is a growing expectation in health systems around the world that patients will be fully informed when adverse events occur. However, current disclosure practices often fall short of this expectation.
Methods:
We reviewed trends in policy and practice in 5 countries with extensive experience with adverse event disclosure: the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia.
Results:
We identified 5 themes that reflect key challenges to disclosure: (1) the challenge of putting policy into large-scale practice, (2) the conflict between patient safety theory and patient expectations, (3) the conflict between legal privilege for quality improvement and open disclosure, (4) the challenge of aligning open disclosure with liability compensation, and (5) the challenge of measurement related to disclosure.
Conclusions:
Potential solutions include health worker education coupled with incentives to embed policy into practice, better communication about approaches beyond the punitive, legislation that allows both disclosure to patients and quality improvement protection for institutions, apology protection for providers, comprehensive disclosure programs that include patient compensation, delinking of patient compensation from regulatory scrutiny of disclosing physicians, legal and contractual requirements for disclosure, and better measurement of its occurrence and quality. A longer-term solution involves educating the public and health care workers about patient safety.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report
Purposes:
In the healthcare industry, reports play a crucial role in documenting incidents within an agency. The primary objective of these reports is to ensure patient safety, uphold the...
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Ethical Standards II
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...
Ethical Standards I
The Code of Ethics provisions outline the nurse's duty to the patient, the healthcare team, the profession, and society. The Code's fundamental principles include advocacy,...
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Types of Reports III: Telephone and Verbal Reports
Here's an overview of each type:
Telephone Orders

