Auramine-phenol vs. modified Kinyoun's acid-fast stains for detection of coccidia parasites
Objective:
Auramine-phenol stain was compared with Kinyoun's acid-fast stain to detect coccidia parasites in fecal samples from immunocompromised patients. The comparison was based on the number of detected cases, sensitivity, specificity, time required for the procedure, ease of use, interpretation, and cost.
Methods:
A total of 112 fecal specimens were examined by conventional methods: Direct wet saline smear, iodine smear, and formol ether sedimentation technique. Duplicate smears of the fecal concentrates were stained by both procedures.
Results:
Kinyoun's and auramine-phenol stains detected 22 and 24 positive coccidia specimens respectively. The control group (27 immunocompetent relatives) showed a high incidence of Giardia lamblia infection. Kinyoun smears were difficult to interpret, while auramine smears were extremely easy to read, thus requiring less time. Artifacts were readily recognizable. The cost of auramine-phenol reagents was much higher than Kinyoun's acid-fast stain.
Conclusion:
Although the overall ranking of both staining techniques was high, the auramine-phenol stain was a more desirable test despite its higher cost.
Related Concept Videos
01:26Differential Staining Technique
01:03Fixation and Sectioning
The simplest type of preparation is the wet mount, in which the specimen is placed in a drop of liquid on the slide. A liquid specimen can be directly deposited on the slide using a dropper. Solid specimens, such as skin scraping, can be placed on the slide before adding a drop of liquid to prepare the wet mount. Sometimes the liquid is simply water, but stains are often added...
01:13Special Staining Techniques
01:17Karyotyping