Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026
Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2022
[Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy via hypogastric/limb subcutaneous approach for early-stage vulvar cancer]
Gaowen Chen1, Yifeng Wang1, Ying Wang1
1Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510282, China.
Objective:
To describe and compare video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy via hypogastric and limb approach (VEIL-H vs VEIL-L) in patients with invasive vulvar cancer.
Methods:
From March 2011 to August 2013, 7 women with early-stage vulvar cancer were selected for this integrated procedure with a combination of VEIL-H and VEIL-L in bilateral groins.VEIL-L was performed on limb with old surgical scar in ipsilateral hypogastric area of 3 patients and VEIL-H in contralateral limb. Both novel procedures were performed with triple trocars respectively. The boundaries of inguinal lymph node dissection were the same template of open inguinal lymphadenectomy. Preoperative data, surgical techniques and follow-up outcomes were compared.Standard statistical tests were used.
Results:
The combination of VEIL-H and VEIL-L was successfully completed in 7 patients without conversion into open surgery. The great saphenous vein was spared in 13 limbs.No difference existed in mean operative duration, average blood loss volume and median total regional lymph nodes removed in two groups. All nodes were confirmed tumor-free. Mean drain duration was (4.7 ± 1.4) days in the VEIL-H group and (2.7 ± 0.9) days in VEIL-L group respectively (P < 0.01). Mean drain volume was (123 ± 55) ml in VEIL-H group and (62 ± 32) ml respectively (P < 0.05). Mean postoperative hospital stay was (8.6 ± 2.2) days.No major intraoperative complications occurred. However, hypercarbia in one patient 1 was completely reversible with hyperventilation.Unilateral great saphenous vein was injured in another one.Regarding postoperative complications, one patient suffered lymphocele in VEIL-H side and another had lymphorrhea through drain orifice in VEIL-L side. During a follow-up period of (19 ± 7) months, there was no disease recurrence so far.
Conclusion:
The combination of VEIL-H and VEIL-L has the reproducibility and therapeutic potentials in the treatment for patients with vulvar cancer. Both minimal invasive techniques are viable. Although short-term results are encouraging, larger series with a longer follow-up are required to fully evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of VEIL-H and VEIL-L.
