Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

1.1K
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
1.1K
Implicit Personality Theories01:23

Implicit Personality Theories

738
Implicit personality theory explains how individuals make assumptions about the relationships between personality traits, behaviors, and character types. When people learn that someone possesses a particular trait, they tend to infer the presence of other related characteristics, forming a cohesive impression. This cognitive shortcut plays a crucial role in social interactions and interpersonal judgments.Central Traits and Their InfluenceSolomon Asch's seminal 1946 study highlighted the power...
738
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

1.0K
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
1.0K
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

59.0K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
59.0K
Understanding Interpersonal Attraction01:25

Understanding Interpersonal Attraction

627
Interpersonal attraction is a fundamental psychological phenomenon influencing human relationships across various contexts. It refers to one person's positive feelings or interests toward another, serving as the foundation for friendships, romantic partnerships, familial bonds, and professional relationships. The nature of interpersonal attraction extends beyond romantic connections, shaping interactions in both short-term and long-term social engagements.Psychological Foundations of...
627
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

59.5K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
59.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interictal discharges spread along local recurrent networks between tubers and surrounding cortex.

The Journal of physiology·2025
Same author

Active Inference and Intentional Behavior.

Neural computation·2025
Same author

Testing the role of spontaneous activity in visuospatial perception with patterned optogenetics.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Predictive processing: Shedding light on the computational processes underlying motivated behavior.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2025
Same author

The paradox of the self-studying brain.

Physics of life reviews·2025
Same author

Stimulus-repetition effects on macaque V1 and V4 microcircuits explain gamma-synchronization increase.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 1, 2026

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Observing Virtual Social Interactions
10:45

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Observing Virtual Social Interactions

Published on: July 6, 2011

11.2K

A formal model of interpersonal inference.

Michael Moutoussis1, Nelson J Trujillo-Barreto2, Wael El-Deredy3

  • 1Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London London, UK.

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
|April 12, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Active Bayesian inference offers a new model for understanding social cognition and interpersonal exchanges. This framework explains how people infer others' mental states and preferences, impacting social behaviors and potentially aiding in understanding psychiatric conditions.

Keywords:
Bayesianactive inferenceevidencefree energyinterpersonalself-organizationsurprisevalue

More Related Videos

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
14:05

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence

Published on: December 15, 2010

24.8K
Social Isolation Model: A Noninvasive Rodent Model of Stress and Anxiety
04:20

Social Isolation Model: A Noninvasive Rodent Model of Stress and Anxiety

Published on: November 11, 2022

5.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 1, 2026

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Observing Virtual Social Interactions
10:45

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Observing Virtual Social Interactions

Published on: July 6, 2011

11.2K
One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
14:05

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence

Published on: December 15, 2010

24.8K
Social Isolation Model: A Noninvasive Rodent Model of Stress and Anxiety
04:20

Social Isolation Model: A Noninvasive Rodent Model of Stress and Anxiety

Published on: November 11, 2022

5.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Social Psychology
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Active Bayesian inference, a decision-making framework, is extended to interpersonal exchanges.
  • Social cognition presents unique challenges that require novel formal modeling.
  • This study demonstrates the psychological significance of applying active inference to social interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To formulate a novel mathematical model for active Bayesian inference in interpersonal exchanges.
  • To integrate utility theory within a Bayesian inference framework for social decision-making.
  • To explore how prior beliefs, incorporating self and other preferences, influence social inference.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review focusing on interpersonal representations.
  • Development of a mathematical model based on Bayesian inference and utility theory.
  • Simulation study to illustrate model dynamics and generate predictions.

Main Results:

  • Interpersonal representations are actively inferred beliefs, akin to mentalizing, based on interaction outcomes.
  • Active interpersonal inference explains social-psychological phenomena like self-serving biases.
  • Bayesian updating of social outcome valuations, including self-perception, is a key component of mentalizing.

Conclusions:

  • A Bayes optimal framework is proposed for modeling individual differences in mentalizing during social interactions.
  • Interpersonal representations are characterized by explicit functional and affective properties.
  • The active inference framework may be valuable for studying psychiatric conditions involving distorted mentalizing.