Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Muscle Stimulation Frequency

Muscle Stimulation Frequency

The contraction strength of muscles is regulated by motor neurons, which modulate the frequency of action potentials dispatched to the motor units based on the body's requirements. This process of varying the muscle stimulation frequency allows muscles to contract with a force that is precisely tailored to the needs of the moment, whether lifting a feather or a heavy box.
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Human hippocampal ripples tune cortical responses based on predicted uncertainty.

Nature neuroscience·2026

Same author

Testing and tracking in the UK: A dynamic causal modelling study.

Wellcome open research·2026

Same author

The evolutionary and organizational bases of active affordance.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026

Same author

The methodological foundations of lesion network mapping remain sound.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

A hybrid micro-ECoG for functionally targeted multi-site and multi-scale investigation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Protocol for investigating the warping of spatial experience across the blind spot to contrast predictions of the Integrated Information Theory and Predictive Processing accounts of consciousness.

PloS one·2026

Same journal

A human-specific genetic modifier reconfigures large-scale cortical network dynamics underlying behavioral performance.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same journal

<i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> uses a eukaryotic-like uridyltransferase to make UDP-GlcNAc for cell wall synthesis.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same journal

Dynamic redistribution of eIF4F controls cap-dependent translation initiation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same journal

When does additional information improve accuracy of RNA secondary structure prediction?

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same journal

Normative brain-state trajectories reveal deviation from healthy aging in Alzheimer's disease.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same journal

Noradrenergic infraslow rhythm during sleep is the critical link between heart-rate dynamics and memory consolidation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Optogenetic Entrainment of Hippocampal Theta Oscillations in Behaving Mice

Optogenetic Entrainment of Hippocampal Theta Oscillations in Behaving Mice

Published on: June 29, 2018

Stimulus-repetition effects on macaque V1 and V4 microcircuits explain gamma-synchronization increase.

Christini Katsanevaki^1,2, Conrado A Bosman^3,4, Karl J Friston⁵

¹Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Frankfurt 60528, Germany.

Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology

|December 23, 2024

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Brain learning strengthens gamma synchronization in visual areas V1 and V4 through internal models. Dynamic Causal Modeling revealed repetition effects on intrinsic connectivity and population input drive this learning-related neural activity.

Keywords:

Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM)gamma learning plasticity precision of prediction error primate visual cortex stimulus repetition

More Related Videos

Combined Shuttle-Box Training with Electrophysiological Cortex Recording and Stimulation as a Tool to Study Perception and Learning

Combined Shuttle-Box Training with Electrophysiological Cortex Recording and Stimulation as a Tool to Study Perception and Learning

Published on: October 22, 2015

Generation of Local CA1 γ Oscillations by Tetanic Stimulation

Generation of Local CA1 γ Oscillations by Tetanic Stimulation

Published on: August 14, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Optogenetic Entrainment of Hippocampal Theta Oscillations in Behaving Mice

Optogenetic Entrainment of Hippocampal Theta Oscillations in Behaving Mice

Published on: June 29, 2018

Combined Shuttle-Box Training with Electrophysiological Cortex Recording and Stimulation as a Tool to Study Perception and Learning

Combined Shuttle-Box Training with Electrophysiological Cortex Recording and Stimulation as a Tool to Study Perception and Learning

Published on: October 22, 2015

Generation of Local CA1 γ Oscillations by Tetanic Stimulation

Generation of Local CA1 γ Oscillations by Tetanic Stimulation

Published on: August 14, 2015

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Computational Neuroscience
Systems Neuroscience

Background:

Animals encounter repeated stimuli, leading to statistical learning captured by internal brain models.
Strengthening of gamma synchronization in primate visual areas V1 and V4 is a known indicator of this learning process.

Purpose of the Study:

To explain the observed increase in gamma synchronization during learning using a computational model.
To identify specific neural connectivity mechanisms underlying repetition-induced gamma synchronization changes in visual cortex.

Main Methods:

A V1-V4 Dynamic Causal Model (DCM) was employed to simulate visually induced responses.
The model analyzed responses across early and late epochs from repeated grating presentations.
Sensitivity analysis and model comparison were used to evaluate the contribution of different connectivity parameters.

Main Results:

The DCM successfully replicated the empirical increases in local and inter-areal gamma synchronization.
Repetition effects on intrinsic connectivity within V1 and V4, and on population input gain, were key drivers.
The optimal model highlighted effects on excitatory populations in V1 (granular, superficial) and V4 (granular, deep).

Conclusions:

Neural learning enhances gamma synchronization via modulations in intrinsic connectivity and input gain, particularly in V1 and V4.
Findings support the hypothesis that gamma synchronization reflects increasing bottom-up signal precision with stimulus repetition and predictability.