Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

2.7K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
2.7K
Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

950
The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
950
Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System01:11

Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System

8.4K
The somatosensory system is the central and peripheral nervous system component that senses and processes touch, pressure, pain, temperature, and body position or proprioception. The process of sensation takes place at three levels:
The receptor level:
The receptor level is the first stage of sensation. It involves the detection of a stimulus by specialized sensory receptors. The stimulus must arrive within the receptor's receptive field. Next, the receptor converts the energy of the...
8.4K
Interference and Diffraction02:18

Interference and Diffraction

28.7K
Interference is a characteristic phenomenon exhibited by waves. When two electromagnetic waves interact with their peaks and troughs coinciding, a resulting wave with enhanced amplitude is produced. This is known as constructive interference. In this case, the two waves interacting are in phase with each other.
28.7K
Vision01:24

Vision

48.6K
Vision is the result of light being detected and transduced into neural signals by the retina of the eye. This information is then further analyzed and interpreted by the brain. First, light enters the front of the eye and is focused by the cornea and lens onto the retina—a thin sheet of neural tissue lining the back of the eye. Because of refraction through the convex lens of the eye, images are projected onto the retina upside-down and reversed.
48.6K
Somatosensation01:33

Somatosensation

36.9K
The somatosensory system relays sensory information from the skin, mucous membranes, limbs, and joints. Somatosensation is more familiarly known as the sense of touch. A typical somatosensory pathway includes three types of long neurons: primary, secondary, and tertiary. Primary neurons have cell bodies located near the spinal cord in groups of neurons called dorsal root ganglia. The sensory neurons of ganglia innervate designated areas of skin called dermatomes.
36.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Working Memory Maintenance of Visual and Auditory Spatial Information Relies on Supramodal Neural Codes in the Dorsal Frontoparietal Cortex.

Brain sciences·2024
Same author

What, if anything, can be considered an amodal sensory dimension?

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2024
Same author

Prokofiev was (almost) right: A cross-cultural investigation of auditory-conceptual associations in Peter and the Wolf.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2024
Same author

Prevalence and predictors of binge eating disorder symptoms among a sample of university students in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional survey.

Health science reports·2023
Same author

More of me: Self-prioritization of numeric stimuli.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2023
Same author

Enhancing the design of wine labels.

Frontiers in psychology·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 1, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

12.7K

Response interference in touch, vision, and crossmodally: beyond the spatial dimension.

Frank Mast1, Christian Frings, Charles Spence

  • 1Department of Psychology, Faculty 1, University of Trier, 54286, Trier, Germany, mastfra@uni-trier.de.

Experimental Brain Research
|April 15, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Visual distractors automatically trigger responses across senses, unlike tactile ones. This study explored crossmodal effects in tactile and visual distractor processing, finding distinct sensory processing pathways.

More Related Videos

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

4.9K
Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

6.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 1, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

12.7K
Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

4.9K
Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

6.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Sensory Processing

Background:

  • Tactile distractor processing research often focuses on spatial attention.
  • Previous studies have not fully isolated the effects of distractor modality independent of spatial cues.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of tactile distractors on attention when spatial location is controlled.
  • To examine crossmodal effects between visual and tactile stimuli in a response priming paradigm.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a response priming paradigm with sequential stimulus presentation from a fixed location.
  • Compared response priming effects for unimodal tactile and visual distractors.
  • Assessed crossmodal priming effects with visual distractors and tactile targets, and vice versa.

Main Results:

  • Similar response priming effects were found for tactile and visual distractors in unimodal settings.
  • Visual distractors showed a crossmodal effect on vibrotactile targets, but tactile distractors did not affect visual targets.
  • This suggests visual stimuli automatically trigger responses, while tactile stimuli are processed based on task relevance.

Conclusions:

  • Visual stimuli have a more automatic crossmodal influence on response selection than tactile stimuli.
  • Sensory modality plays a crucial role in how distractors affect attention and response priming.
  • Findings indicate distinct processing pathways for visual and tactile information concerning automaticity and crossmodal interactions.