[Partnership-based research as a space to support innovation]

Area of Science:

• Social Sciences
• Program Evaluation
• Knowledge Management

Context:

• Joint evaluations involve multiple stakeholders with diverse interests and responsibilities.
• Bridging the gap between expert knowledge and experiential knowledge is crucial for effective program evaluation.
• Negotiation and adjustment are inherent in collaborative evaluation processes.

Purpose:

• To explore strategies for fostering dialogue between expert and experiential knowledge.
• To identify frameworks for creating scientifically based and practically useful evaluation knowledge.
• To examine the role of negotiated partnerships in joint evaluation.

Summary:

• Joint evaluation necessitates balancing diverse stakeholder concerns through negotiation.
• An advisory committee, acting as an interface, is vital for successful partnership-based research.
• This framework supports a reflexive system, enriching problem formulation and actions as intervention knowledge grows.

Impact:

• Facilitates the creation of actionable, evidence-based insights for program stakeholders.
• Enhances social innovation by integrating diverse knowledge sources into program development.
• Promotes successful collaborative research through structured stakeholder engagement.